Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Macerated Tissue to Visualize the Extracellular Matrix
Published on: June 14, 2016
Activation of Inflammatory and Pro-Thrombotic Pathways in Acute Stress Cardiomyopathy
Timothy P Fitzgibbons1, Yvonne J K Edwards2, Peter Shaw1
1Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Insights
Stress cardiomyopathy (SCM) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) activate similar inflammatory pathways, despite SCM having less heart muscle damage. This may explain SCM
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Proteomics
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Stress cardiomyopathy (SCM) mimics acute myocardial infarction (AMI) but lacks coronary occlusion.
- The underlying mechanisms of SCM-induced cardiac dysfunction remain unclear.
- SCM predominantly affects women and shares clinical symptoms with AMI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate mechanistic differences between SCM and AMI using proteomic analysis.
- To identify potential biomarkers differentiating SCM from AMI.
- To understand the biological pathways involved in SCM pathogenesis.
Main Methods:
- Serum samples from normal controls, AMI patients, and SCM patients were analyzed.
- A SOMAscan assay measured concentrations of 1,310 serum proteins.
- Proteomic data was compared between groups at acute and recovery phases.
Main Results:
- AMI patients exhibited greater myocyte necrosis (higher troponin I) than SCM patients.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was similarly reduced in both acute AMI and SCM.
- SCM patients showed significantly greater LVEF improvement during follow-up compared to AMI patients.
- No significant protein expression differences were found between acute AMI and SCM.
- Both AMI and SCM showed activated complement, coagulation, and inflammation pathways compared to controls.
- Four proteins trended higher in SCM versus AMI but did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusions:
- SCM and AMI share activated inflammatory, complement, and coagulation pathways, despite differing levels of myocardial necrosis.
- These shared pathways may contribute to short-term thromboembolic complications and long-term mortality risks in SCM.
- Proteomic analysis did not reveal distinct molecular signatures between acute SCM and AMI, suggesting overlapping pathophysiological processes.
Abstract:
Stress cardiomyopathy (SCM) is a unique cardiac disorder that more often occurs in women. SCM presents in a similar fashion as acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with chest pain, ECG changes, and congestive heart failure. The primary distinguishing feature is the absence of thrombotic coronary occlusion in SCM. How this reduction in cardiac function occurs in the absence of coronary occlusion remains unknown. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that a targeted proteomic comparison of patients with acute SCM and AMI might identify relevant mechanistic differences. Blood was drawn in normal controls (n = 6), women with AMI (n = 12), or women with acute SCM (n = 15). Two-week follow-up samples were available in AMI (n = 4) and SCM patients (n = 11). Relative concentrations of 1,310 serum proteins were measured in each of the 48 samples using the SOMAscan assay. Women with AMI had greater myocyte necrosis, as reflected by a higher peak troponin I concentration (AMI 32.03 ± 29.46 vs. SCM 2.68 ± 2.6 ng/ml, p < 0.05). AMI and SCM patients had equivalent reductions in left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF (%) 39 ± 12 vs. 37 ± 12, p = 0.479]. In follow-up, women with SCM had a greater improvement in cardiac function [LVEF (%) 60 ± 7 vs. 45 ± 13, p < 0.001]. No differentially expressed proteins were detected (absolute log2-fold change >1; q < 0.05) between AMI and SCM in the acute or recovery phase. However, when we compared normal controls to patients with AMI, there was differential expression of 35 proteins. When we compared normal controls to patients with SCM, 45 proteins were differentially expressed. In comparison to normal controls, biological processes such as complement, coagulation, and inflammation were activated in both AMI and SCM. There were four proteins that showed a non-significant trend to be increased in acute SCM vs. AMI (netrin-1, follistatin-like 3, kallikrein 7, kynureninase). Despite a lesser degree of myocardial necrosis than AMI, SCM is characterized by a similar activation of inflammatory, complement, and coagulation pathways. These findings may explain reported thromboembolic complications in the short term and elevated risk of mortality in the long term of SCM.
More Related Videos
06:55An Unpredictable Chronic Mild Stress Protocol for Instigating Depressive Symptoms, Behavioral Changes and Negative Health Outcomes in Rodents
Published on: December 2, 2015
07:51Implantation of a Carotid Cuff for Triggering Shear-stress Induced Atherosclerosis in Mice
Published on: January 13, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Physiological Foundation of Stress
Role of the Sympathetic Nervous System
Adrenaline triggers the...
Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis
Sympathetic Activation