Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Normothermic Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Mouse Model of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
Published on: August 30, 2011
Inotropes and cardiorenal syndrome in acute heart failure - A retrospective comparative analysis
Marta Madeira1, Francisca Caetano2, Inês Almeida3
1Serviço de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra - Hospital Geral, Coimbra, Portugal; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Insights
Levosimendan use in acute heart failure (AHF) patients was linked to lower cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) incidence and improved renal function recovery compared to dobutamine. Cystatin C levels predicted CRS risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is a frequent complication in acute heart failure (AHF) with poor prognosis.
- Levosimendan, a positive inotrope with diuretic properties, may offer renal benefits, but evidence is conflicting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare CRS incidence in AHF patients treated with levosimendan versus dobutamine.
- To identify predictors of CRS to guide the selection of renoprotective inotropes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 108 AHF patients requiring inotropes.
- Patients were divided into levosimendan and dobutamine groups.
- Primary endpoint: CRS incidence; secondary: mortality and readmission.
Main Results:
- Levosimendan group showed lower CRS incidence and better renal function recovery.
- Higher in-hospital mortality was observed in the dobutamine group.
- Elevated cystatin C levels predicted CRS development.
Conclusions:
- Levosimendan demonstrates a potential renoprotective effect in AHF patients.
- Assessing cystatin C can help identify high-risk patients for tailored therapy.
- Optimizing inotrope choice may reduce CRS incidence and improve AHF outcomes.
Introduction:
Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is common in acute heart failure (AHF), and is associated with dire prognosis. Levosimendan, a positive inotrope that also has diuretic effects, may improve patients' renal profile. Published results are conflicting.
Objectives:
We aimed to assess the incidence of CRS in AHF patients according to the inotrope used and to determine its predictors in order to identify patients who could benefit from the most renoprotective inotrope.
Methods:
In a retrospective study, 108 consecutive patients with AHF who required inotropes were divided into two groups according to the inotrope used (levosimendan vs. dobutamine). The primary endpoint was CRS incidence. Follow-up for mortality and readmission for AHF was conducted.
Results:
Seventy-one percent of the study population were treated with levosimendan and the remainder with dobutamine. No differences were found in heart failure etiology or chronic kidney disease. At admission, the dobutamine group had lower blood pressure; there were no differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate or cystatin C levels. The levosimendan group had lower left ventricular ejection fraction. CRS incidence was higher in the dobutamine group, and they more often had incomplete recovery of renal function at discharge. In multivariate analysis, cystatin C levels predicted CRS. The dobutamine group had higher in-hospital mortality, of which CRS and the inotrope used were predictors.
Conclusions:
Levosimendan appears to have some renoprotective effect, as it was associated with a lower incidence of CRS and better recovery of renal function at discharge. Identification of patients at increased risk of renal dysfunction by assessing cystatin C may enable more tailored therapy, minimizing the incidence of CRS and its negative impact on outcome in AHF.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers

