Comparative studies of calcium-channel blockers and beta-blockers in essential hypertension: clinical implications

The use of calcium-channel blockers to treat essential hypertension is increasing, and in the United States several new drug applications for this indication are under consideration by the Food and Drug Administration. Although the ability of the calcium-channel blockers to lower blood pressure has been established, their efficacy and safety in relation to current therapy require further clarification. This article reviews studies in which calcium-channel blockers and beta-blockers have been compared, including seven with verapamil, four with nifedipine and nitrendipine and two with diltiazem. These studies indicate that the two classes of agents produce similar antihypertensive effects and are associated with a comparable incidence of adverse reactions. In addition, the preliminary findings of a multicenter trial in which 50 subjects with mild or moderate hypertension were treated with diltiazem (60 to 180 mg bid) or propranolol (80 to 240 mg bid) for 4 to 6 months are presented. Both medications significantly lowered blood pressure (from 148 +/- 17/101 +/- 5 to 133 +/- 25/88 +/- 9 mm Hg on diltiazem and from 154 +/- 22/104 +/- 6 to 146 +/- 23/91 +/- 11 mm Hg on propranolol). Fifty-nine percent of the patients on diltiazem and 40% of those on propranolol achieved the treatment goal of a supine diastolic blood pressure under 90 mm Hg together with minimum 10 mm Hg reduction. In a similar study, exercise blood pressure and exercise capacity were also examined, with the most important finding being a reduction in maximal oxygen consumption and exercise duration on propranolol without a significant change on diltiazem.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)