Crystal digital droplet PCR for detection and quantification of circulating EGFR sensitizing and resistance mutations

Cécile Jovelet1, Jordan Madic2, Jordi Remon3

  • 1Plateforme de Génomique-BMO et Centre de Ressources Biologiques, AMMICA, INSERM US23/CNRS UMS3655, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Plos One
|August 23, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Crystal Digital PCR offers superior detection of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) compared to Massive Parallel Sequencing (MPS), aiding adaptive treatment decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) improve outcomes for some non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with specific mutations.
  • Tumor resistance to TKIs necessitates alternative therapeutic strategies and adaptive treatment decisions.
  • Monitoring molecular profiles of tumors at disease progression is crucial for effective treatment planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare Crystal™ Digital™ PCR and Massive Parallel Sequencing (MPS) for monitoring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant tumors over time.
  • To assess the quantity of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma as a method for tracking tumor evolution.
  • To evaluate the utility of ctDNA monitoring in guiding adaptive treatment decisions for advanced NSCLC.

Main Methods:

  • Plasma circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from 61 advanced NSCLC patients was analyzed.
  • Mutated allelic fraction was measured using both Crystal™ Digital™ PCR and MPS.
  • Correlation between the two methods was assessed, and detection rates for sensitizing and resistance mutations were compared.

Main Results:

  • An overall correlation of 78% was found between mutated allelic fraction measurements by Crystal™ Digital™ PCR and MPS.
  • Crystal™ Digital™ PCR detected 7 additional samples with sensitizing mutations and 4 with resistance mutations missed by MPS.
  • Monitoring ctDNA levels over time showed a correlation with clinical assessment of disease in 6 patients.

Conclusions:

  • Crystal™ Digital™ PCR demonstrates good performance for monitoring mutational status in plasma cfDNA.
  • Crystal™ Digital™ PCR appears better suited than MPS for detecting known mutations, offering faster results.
  • Accurate and timely monitoring of ctDNA mutations can support adaptive treatment strategies in NSCLC.

Related Concept Videos