Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Caesarean Section Refusal in the Irish Courts: Health Service Executive v B
1Wellcome Trust Post-Doctoral Research Associate, Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, Dickson Poon School of Law, King's College London, Strand WC2R 2LS, London, UK.
Abstract:
In the Irish High Court case of Health Service Executive v B, it was held that a competent woman could not be forced to have a caesarean section against her will notwithstanding the fact that her refusal increased the risk of injury and death to both her and her unborn child.1 This case is of particular interest since it is the first reported case on caesarean section refusal in Ireland. This commentary provides a critical analysis of the judgment, focusing on aspects of the law on informed consent and the way in which the judge reached the conclusion that an order for an enforced caesarean section should not be made. It is argued that, while the outcome can be justified, the reasoning appears at times to be unpersuasive.
Related Concept Videos
Obedience
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...

