Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

50.3K
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
50.3K
Phylogeny01:23

Phylogeny

63.3K
Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon (singular). Taxa (plural) can span different levels of the evolutionary hierarchy. For instance, the group containing all birds is a taxon (comprising the class Aves), and the group of all species of daisies (the genus Bellis) is a taxon. Phylogenies can likewise include just one genus (i.e., depict species relationships) or span an entire kingdom.
63.3K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

7.1K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
7.1K
Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

4.6K
An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
4.6K
Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

2.9K
2.9K
Molecular Shapes01:18

Molecular Shapes

62.7K
Molecules have characteristic shapes that are crucial for their function. The arrangement of various electron groups around the central atom dictates their molecular geometry. Electron pairs in the valence shell of a central atom will adopt an arrangement that minimizes repulsions between the electron pairs by maximizing the distance between them. The valence electrons form either bonding pairs, located primarily between bonded atoms, or lone pairs.
Two regions of electron density in a diatomic...
62.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Splenic Vein Tumor Thrombosis in a Patient With an Oligometastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Challenges of AI-generated stigmatizing language regarding substance use disorders.

Journal of addictive diseases·2026
Same author

Counting Spinal Phylogenetic Networks.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same author

Investigating optimal warming techniques for hypothermia in a swine model of ischemia.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Correction: "Distinguishing Phylogenetic Level-2 Networks with Quartets and Inter-Taxon Quartet Distances".

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same author

In Memoriam: Max Fink MD 1923-2025.

Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry·2025
Same journal

Numerical modeling of fluid exchange between a collecting lymphatic vessel and the surrounding tissue.

Journal of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

A perception-memory PDE framework for seasonal migration dynamics.

Journal of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Dynamic resource allocation in eukaryotic Resource Balance Analysis.

Journal of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Discrete-time exploitative competition model of different stage-specific predators.

Journal of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Spatiotemporal SEIQR Epidemic Modeling with Optimal Control for Vaccination, Treatment, and Social Measures.

Journal of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Phenotypic plasticity trade-offs in an age-structured model of bacterial growth under stress.

Journal of mathematical biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.6K

Bounds for phylogenetic network space metrics.

Andrew Francis1, Katharina T Huber2, Vincent Moulton2

  • 1Centre for Research in Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.

Journal of Mathematical Biology
|August 25, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces new metrics for phylogenetic networks, generalizing tree metrics. These metrics help quantify evolutionary distances and will aid in developing network search algorithms.

Keywords:
DiameterNearest-neighbor interchange (NNI)Phylogenetic network metricsPhylogenetic networksSpaces of phylogenetic networks

More Related Videos

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

36.2K
Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
09:49

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.6K
A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

36.2K
Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
09:49

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.9K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Graph Theory

Background:

  • Phylogenetic trees model evolutionary history, but reticulate evolution requires more complex structures like phylogenetic networks.
  • A recent space of unrooted phylogenetic networks was introduced, defined by specific graph properties and leaf sets.
  • This space is equipped with operations (nearest neighbor interchange and triangle) enabling transformations between networks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive bounds for a new metric (d) on the space of unrooted phylogenetic networks.
  • To analyze a related metric ([Formula: see text]) restricted to networks with a fixed number of vertices.
  • To introduce and bound two new metrics (SPR and TBR) generalizing existing tree metrics.

Main Methods:

  • Defining a metric space on unrooted phylogenetic networks using graph operations.
  • Deriving analytical bounds for the introduced network metrics.
  • Generalizing existing phylogenetic tree metrics (NNI, SPR, TBR) to the network context.

Main Results:

  • Established bounds for the metric d on the space of unrooted phylogenetic networks.
  • Derived bounds for a restricted metric [Formula: see text] on networks with a fixed number of vertices.
  • Introduced and provided bounds for the SPR and TBR metrics on phylogenetic networks.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides novel metrics and bounds for phylogenetic networks, extending tree metrics.
  • These findings offer a quantitative framework for understanding evolutionary relationships in reticulate evolution.
  • The results are expected to advance the development and comprehension of network search algorithms in phylogenetics.