Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.6K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.6K
Introducing Social Perception01:29

Introducing Social Perception

420
Perceiving others accurately is fundamental to effective communication and relationship-building. Social perception, a key concept in social psychology, refers to the cognitive processes through which individuals gather and interpret information about others to understand their actions, intentions, and motivations. This process extends beyond spoken words and overt behaviors, incorporating subtle nonverbal cues and contextual factors.Nonverbal Cues and Their SignificanceNonverbal cues play a...
420
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

275
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
275
Non-Verbal Cues01:29

Non-Verbal Cues

366
Non-verbal communication extends beyond gestures and facial expressions to include vocal elements known as paralanguage. Paralanguage consists of non-verbal vocal cues such as pitch, loudness, speech rate, pauses, and non-verbal vocalizations like laughter, sighs, and moans. These elements not only accompany speech but also provide critical emotional and contextual information.The Role of Paralanguage in CommunicationParalanguage adds depth to spoken language by conveying emotions and...
366
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

2.9K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
2.9K
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.3K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Unheard voices: the overlooked mental health toll of climate change in vulnerable communities.

BMJ mental health·2026
Same author

Internal representations of facial emotions in schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia research. Cognition·2026
Same author

Evaluating child-caregiver attachment beyond infancy when language barriers exist: Longitudinal study in a protracted crisis.

Child development·2026
Same author

"There is no hope; only strong wind": How climate change impacts adolescent mental health in southern Madagascar.

The journal of climate change and health·2026
Same author

Introducing Philosophy Corner.

Perception·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K

Comparing averaging limits for social cues over space and time.

Joseph Florey1, Steven C Dakin2,3, Isabelle Mareschal1

  • 1Experimental Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Journal of Vision
|August 25, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Human observers struggle to average gaze direction over time compared to head direction. Limited peripheral vision appears to be the main constraint, impacting social attention perception.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K
Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

12.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K
Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

12.9K

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Observers can extract summary statistics from groups of faces, including mean emotion or identity.
  • Equivalent noise analysis quantifies internal noise and effective sample size (ESS) to understand averaging performance limits.
  • Previous studies show lower ESS and higher internal noise for averaging gaze direction versus head direction in spatially distributed faces.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare limits on averaging gaze and head direction under spatial and sequential presentation conditions using equivalent noise analysis.
  • To investigate the impact of presentation format (spatial vs. sequential) on the perception of social attention cues.
  • To identify shared or distinct neural mechanisms underlying the processing of different social cues.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized equivalent noise analysis to measure internal noise and effective sample size (ESS).
  • Compared performance in averaging gaze direction versus head direction.
  • Examined two presentation conditions: spatially distributed faces and sequentially presented faces.
  • Conducted correlation analysis across participants to identify shared processing limits.

Main Results:

  • Differences in ESS between gaze and head direction averaging were observed in spatial arrays, but disappeared in sequential presentations.
  • The disappearance of ESS differences suggests limited peripheral gaze perception hinders accurate averaging over time.
  • Correlation analysis revealed general limits on internal noise across stimulus and presentation types.
  • No clear shared limits for ESS were found across participants, suggesting distinct processing for this metric.

Conclusions:

  • Limited peripheral gaze perception is a key factor restricting the averaging of gaze direction over time.
  • Shared neural mechanisms may exist in early visual processing stages, particularly for internal noise.
  • The findings highlight distinct limitations in processing different social attention cues, especially concerning temporal averaging.