Impact of hybrid molecular imaging in retroperitoneal fibrosis: a systematic review

Isidora T Grozdic Milojevic1,2, Bogomir Milojevic3, Dragana P Sobic-Saranovic4,5

  • 1Center for Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Visegradska 26, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia. drisidora.grozdic@yahoo.com.

Insights

Hybrid molecular imaging, including FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MR, shows promise for evaluating retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) activity. These techniques aid in assessing disease progression and predicting treatment response, offering a more accurate and comfortable alternative to separate imaging studies.

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear medicine
  • Radiology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare condition characterized by inflammation and fibrosis in the retroperitoneum.
  • Accurate assessment of RPF inflammatory activity is crucial for effective management and treatment monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the utility of hybrid molecular imaging techniques, specifically FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MR, in assessing inflammatory activity in RPF.
  • To determine the role of these advanced imaging modalities in disease evaluation, therapeutic response prediction, and treatment personalization.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, searching for studies on RPF, disease activity, and hybrid imaging (PET/CT, PET/MR).
  • Inclusion criteria focused on full-text English articles, excluding case reports and reviews. Nine articles involving 186 patients were included.

Main Results:

  • Hybrid molecular imaging demonstrates promising results for evaluating RPF activity, disease quantification, and predicting therapeutic response.
  • FDG PET/CT is valuable for detecting disease activity, especially in asymptomatic patients with elevated acute phase reactants.
  • While PET/MR offers reduced radiation exposure, PET quantification parameters may provide higher diagnostic value for RPF compared to MR parameters.

Conclusions:

  • Hybrid imaging, including FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MR, offers a more comfortable, accurate, and less burdensome approach compared to separate imaging studies for RPF evaluation.
  • These techniques can guide medical therapy, predict treatment outcomes, and inform decisions like stent removal.
  • Acute phase reactants alone are insufficient for reliable RPF management and follow-up.