Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
Published on: February 3, 2023
Influence of epistasis on response to genomic selection using complete sequence data.
Natalia S Forneris1,2, Zulma G Vitezica3, Andres Legarra3
1Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB Consortium, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain. forneris@agro.uba.ar.
Epistasis significantly impacts selection response by altering genetic variance, especially under divergent selection. Genomic selection models are robust, but accounting for epistasis offers medium-term benefits.
Area of Science:
- Quantitative Genetics
- Genomics
- Evolutionary Biology
Background:
- Epistasis's effect on selection response is debated.
- Investigated epistasis in genomic best linear prediction (GBLUP) using Drosophila sequence data.
- Explored benefits of including epistasis in models and knowing causal mutations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess epistasis's impact on sequence-based selection response under strong, asymmetrical epistasis and divergent selection.
- To evaluate the advantage of incorporating epistasis into genomic evaluation models.
- To determine the benefit of identifying causal mutations for selection.
Main Methods:
- Simulated divergent selection on Drosophila sequence data.
- Utilized genomic best linear prediction (GBLUP) for genomic selection.
- Compared selection response with and without accounting for epistasis in the model.
Main Results:
- Selection response driven by few loci with large effects, showing high asymmetry due to skewed allele frequencies.
- Epistasis amplified selection asymmetry by modulating additive genetic variance, sustaining it longer under upward selection.
- Selection response was largely insensitive to the GBLUP model, but including epistasis when absent reduced accuracy over time.
Conclusions:
- Epistatic interactions modulate additive genetic variance, potentially increasing selection response beyond additive effects.
- Genomic evaluation models, including GBLUP, demonstrate robustness to model complexity.
- Accounting for epistasis is beneficial in the medium term when it is present.
More Related Videos
05:53Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
Published on: August 21, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Epistasis Analysis
Epistasis
Incomplete Dominance
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons