Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.0K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.1K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.1K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.1K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.1K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.6K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

4.2K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
4.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A new method for the peak analysis of gamma-ray spectra.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2025
Same author

Calculation of the detection limits with the least-squares method in gamma-ray spectrometry: A simple procedure.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2024
Same author

Decision threshold as a gauge of the measurement quality in gamma-ray spectrometric measurements.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2023
Same author

Influence of the solar activity on the background of a high-resolution gamma-ray spectrometer.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2023
Same author

Calculation of decision thresholds according to the standard ISO 11929-3 in case of presence of the peaked background.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2023
Same author

Sensitivity analysis in a radiological impact assessment of a nuclear power plant discharge. A comparison of the Morris, Spearman and Sobol' approaches.

Journal of environmental radioactivity·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform
06:31

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.7K

An alternative approach to the decision threshold.

M Korun1, B Vodenik1, B Zorko1

  • 1"Jožef Stefan" Institute, Jamova cesta 39, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Applied Radiation and Isotopes : Including Data, Instrumentation and Methods for Use in Agriculture, Industry and Medicine
|August 28, 2017
PubMed
Summary

The decision threshold depends on conversion factor uncertainty through two distinct effects. Variability in the conversion factor directly impacts the threshold and indirectly affects it when not evaluated for null measurements.

Keywords:
Conversion factorDecision thresholdIndicationLognormal distributionNull measurementUncertainty

More Related Videos

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.4K
Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

3.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform
06:31

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.7K
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.4K
Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

3.3K

Area of Science:

  • Measurement science
  • Metrology

Background:

  • Decision thresholds are crucial in measurement science for interpreting results.
  • Uncertainty in conversion factors can affect the reliability of these thresholds.
  • Understanding these dependencies is vital for accurate scientific interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and explain the effects of conversion factor uncertainty on decision thresholds.
  • To analyze how conversion factor variability influences decision-making in measurements.
  • To evaluate the magnitude and nature of these identified effects.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of measurement models.
  • Mathematical evaluation of decision threshold dependencies.
  • Simulation or experimental validation of identified effects (details not provided in abstract).

Main Results:

  • Two primary effects were identified linking conversion factor uncertainty to decision threshold dependence.
  • The first effect shows a direct influence of conversion factor variability on the decision threshold.
  • The second effect demonstrates an indirect influence mediated by the measurand's value, particularly when not evaluated for null measurements.

Conclusions:

  • The decision threshold's reliance on conversion factor uncertainty is confirmed through two distinct mechanisms.
  • Accurate characterization of conversion factor variability is essential for robust decision-making in metrology.
  • These findings provide a deeper understanding of uncertainty propagation in measurement evaluation.