Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

7.2K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.2K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

570
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
570
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

888
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
888
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

22.6K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
22.6K
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation01:09

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

10.3K
The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
10.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.4K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fixing science means an end to gaming the system.

PLoS biology·2024
Same author

What's in a Badge? A Computational Reproducibility Investigation of the Open Data Badge Policy in One Issue of <i>Psychological Science</i>.

Psychological science·2023
Same author

Statistical heartburn: an attempt to digest four pizza publications from the Cornell Food and Brand Lab.

BMC nutrition·2020
Same author

Prevention of suicidal behaviour: Results of a controlled community-based intervention study in four European countries.

PloS one·2019
Same author

Extraordinary claims require compelling evidence: Concerns about "loving-kindness meditation slows biological aging in novices".

Psychoneuroendocrinology·2019
Same author

Does Twitter language reliably predict heart disease? A commentary on Eichstaedt et al. (2015a).

PeerJ·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence
07:54

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence

Published on: October 25, 2011

19.3K

Emodiversity: Robust predictor of outcomes or statistical artifact?

Nicholas J L Brown1, James C Coyne1

  • 1Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|August 29, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study questions the concept of emotional diversity (emodiversity), finding its measurement and claimed health benefits may be statistical artifacts. Reanalysis suggests the original findings lack robust support.

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence
07:54

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence

Published on: October 25, 2011

19.3K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Emotional Health
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Emotional diversity (emodiversity) proposed as a measure of emotional ecosystem health.
  • Emodiversity claimed as an independent predictor of mental and physical health.
  • Analogy drawn between emodiversity and biological diversity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Critically evaluate the theoretical and practical deficiencies of the emodiversity construct.
  • Investigate the validity of using Shannon's entropy formula to measure emodiversity.
  • Reanalyze existing studies to verify claims about emodiversity's predictive power.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical critique of the emodiversity concept.
  • Reanalysis of two large-scale studies by Quoidbach et al. (2014).
  • Application of hierarchical regression and analysis of suppression effects.

Main Results:

  • Identified theoretical and practical deficiencies in the emodiversity construct.
  • Demonstrated that Shannon's entropy formula is a questionable measure for emodiversity.
  • Reanalysis indicated that reported effects of emodiversity were likely due to statistical artifacts (hierarchical regression failure, suppression effects).

Conclusions:

  • The concept of emodiversity, as formulated and measured by Quoidbach et al., faces significant theoretical and methodological challenges.
  • The claimed association between emodiversity and improved health outcomes appears unsubstantiated upon closer statistical scrutiny.
  • Further research is needed to validate or refute the utility of emodiversity as a psychological construct.