Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

95.7K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
95.7K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.3K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.3K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

42.7K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
42.7K
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

552
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
552
First Impression01:09

First Impression

266
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
266
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

15.5K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Creating common virtual ground: Protocols to democratize open VR research.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Quality over quantity: association between autistic traits and daily-life social interactions in adolescents and young adults from the TwinssCan cohort.

CNS spectrums·2026
Same author

Genetic sensitivity to the environment moderates the impact of positive and negative childhood experiences on psychological adjustment "for good and for bad".

European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists·2026
Same author

Sex differences in the effect of childhood adversity and coping strategies on psychosis expression: A TwinssCan study.

European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists·2026
Same author

Adjustment of Assessors' First Impressions Differs by Student Ethnicity.

Perspectives on medical education·2025
Same author

Personality in personnel recruitment.

Current opinion in psychology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.9K

Implicit Age Cues in Resumes: Subtle Effects on Hiring Discrimination.

Eva Derous1, Jeroen Decoster2

  • 1Department of Personnel Management, Work, and Organizational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent UniversityGhent, Belgium.

Frontiers in Psychology
|August 30, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Anonymous resume screening fails to prevent age discrimination. Subtle age cues on resumes, like old-fashioned activities, significantly reduce older applicants

Keywords:
ageanonymous resume screeninghiring discriminationjob market signaling theoryrecruitment

More Related Videos

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing
04:30

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

Published on: October 25, 2019

6.1K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.9K
An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing
04:30

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

Published on: October 25, 2019

6.1K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Organizational Psychology
  • Human Resource Management
  • Sociology of Work

Background:

  • Anonymous resume screening is often proposed to mitigate hiring discrimination.
  • Existing research on age discrimination in hiring has primarily focused on explicit age cues.
  • The impact of subtle, implicit age cues on resume screening remains underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if older applicants benefit from concealing explicit age signals (date of birth) on resumes.
  • To determine if implicit age cues (names, activities) negatively affect older applicants' hirability.
  • To examine the effectiveness of anonymous resume screening in reducing age-based hiring discrimination.

Main Methods:

  • An experimental study involving 610 human resource (HR) professionals.
  • A mixed factorial design was employed to assess the impact of resume content on hiring ratings.
  • Participants evaluated resumes with varying levels of explicit and implicit age-related information.

Main Results:

  • Hiring discrimination against older applicants was evident, driven by implicit age cues on resumes.
  • This age-based discrimination was amplified when older HR professionals served as raters.
  • Concealing explicit age information (date of birth) resulted in generally lower applicant ratings.

Conclusions:

  • Anonymous resume screening does not eliminate age discriminatory effects in hiring.
  • Implicit age cues on resumes significantly disadvantage older job applicants.
  • HR professionals should be trained to recognize and mitigate biases related to subtle age indicators.