Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
Published on: March 1, 2019
Self Regulation, Cognitive Capacity and Risk Taking: Investigating Heterogeneity Among Adolescents with
Maria-Zoe Hadjicharalambous1, Kostas A Fanti2
1Department of Psychology, University of Cyprus, PO Box 1601, Nicosia, Cyprus. mz.hadjicharalambous@gmail.com.
Abstract:
The majority of prior work focuses on understanding the association between callous-unemotional (CU) traits and conduct problems, providing limited information on why some youth who score high on CU traits do not engage in conduct problem behaviors. The current study investigated heterogeneity among a sub-sample of adolescents with CU traits (N = 152; Mage = 13.09, SD = 2.76, 45.6% female) identified from a large community sample. Three groups were compared: control, callous-unemotional traits only (CU-only), and combined callous-unemotional and conduct problems (CU + CP). Participants were administered a battery of neuropsychological computerized tasks assessing risk taking, self-regulation and cognitive capacity. Results indicated that youth high on CU traits and low on CP scored higher on self-regulation and were less likely to make risky decisions compared to youth with combined CU + CP. In general, the findings provided information that heterogeneity within CU traits can be explained based on differences in neuro-cognitive functioning. In addition, the characteristics of youth high on CU traits only can provide information for interventions aiming to decrease conduct problems among youth high on these traits.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Regulation
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Adolescence

