Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Population Growth

Population Growth

Population size is dynamic, increasing with birth rates and immigration, and decreasing with death rates and emigration. In ideal conditions with unlimited resources, populations can increase exponentially, which plots as a J-shaped growth rate curve of population size against time. This type of curve is characteristic of newly-introduced invasive species, or populations that have suffered catastrophic declines and are rebounding.

Optimal Foraging

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.

Osmoregulation in Fishes

Osmoregulation in Fishes

When cells are placed in a hypotonic (low-salt) fluid, they can swell and burst. Meanwhile, cells in a hypertonic solution—with a higher salt concentration—can shrivel and die. How do fish cells avoid these gruesome fates in hypotonic freshwater or hypertonic seawater environments?

Habitat Fragmentation

Habitat Fragmentation

Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.

Ecological Niches

Ecological Niches

All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.

Speciation Rates

Speciation Rates

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Diversity and functional group composition drive biogeographic patterns in marine biogenic structural complexity.

Ecology·2026

Same author

Functional trait analysis reveals the hidden stability of multitrophic communities.

Ecology·2025

Same author

Conservation benefits of a large marine protected area network that spans multiple ecosystems.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2025

Same author

A Pleistocene legacy structures variation in modern seagrass ecosystems.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022

Same author

The biogeography of community assembly: latitude and predation drive variation in community trait distribution in a guild of epifaunal crustaceans.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2022

Same author

3D genomics across the tree of life reveals condensin II as a determinant of architecture type.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

Structural complexity and fish body size interactively affect habitat optimality.

Mallarie E Yeager^1,2, Kevin A Hovel³

¹Coastal and Marine Institute & Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA. mallarieyeager1@gmail.com.

|August 30, 2017

Summary

Juvenile giant kelpfish choose eelgrass habitats based on size. Smaller fish prefer dense seagrass for safety and growth, while larger fish opt for sparse areas to improve foraging efficiency.

Keywords:

Foraging efficiency Mesopredator Ontogeny Optimality models Predation risk

More Related Videos

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Published on: January 13, 2023

Basic Methods for the Study of Reproductive Ecology of Fish in Aquaria

Basic Methods for the Study of Reproductive Ecology of Fish in Aquaria

Published on: July 20, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Published on: January 13, 2023

Basic Methods for the Study of Reproductive Ecology of Fish in Aquaria

Basic Methods for the Study of Reproductive Ecology of Fish in Aquaria

Published on: July 20, 2017

Area of Science:

Marine ecology
Behavioral ecology
Habitat selection

Background:

Habitat structure significantly influences predator-prey dynamics in coastal ecosystems.
Seagrass beds offer variable structural complexity (SC) at fine spatial scales.
Optimal habitat use for juvenile fishes balances foraging needs with predation risk, influenced by body size.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how ontogenetic shifts in body size affect habitat selection in juvenile giant kelpfish (Heterostichus rostratus) within eelgrass (Zostera marina) meadows.
To determine the influence of varying structural complexity (SC) on habitat association, predation risk, and foraging efficiency across different size classes of juvenile giant kelpfish.
To test the hypothesis that optimal SC for juvenile giant kelpfish changes with ontogeny.

Main Methods:

Quantified structural complexity (SC) in eelgrass habitats.
Assessed habitat associations of three size classes of juvenile giant kelpfish.
Measured relative predation risk and foraging efficiency for each size class across varying SC levels.

Main Results:

Habitat selection varied significantly with fish size: small kelpfish preferred dense eelgrass, while larger individuals selected sparse eelgrass.
Small kelpfish exhibited lower relative predation risk and higher foraging efficiency in dense eelgrass, indicating selection for growth and safety.
Larger kelpfish showed higher foraging efficiency in sparse eelgrass, suggesting a shift in habitat preference to maximize feeding opportunities.

Conclusions:

Trade-offs between predation risk and foraging efficiency exist within seagrass habitats and are ontogeny-dependent.
Seagrass habitat value for juvenile giant kelpfish changes throughout their development.
Variability in structural complexity within seagrass patches may enhance overall habitat value.