Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.3K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Even distorted felt size engenders visual-haptic integration.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2020
Same author

Again, knowledge of common source fails to promote visual-haptic integration.

Perceptual and motor skills·2014
Same author

A "unity assumption" does not promote intersensory integration.

Experimental psychology·2011
Same author

Practise strengthens haptic capture.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2009
Same journal

Preferential Cup Size and End-State Comfort in Children.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K

Touch Precision Modulates Visual Bias.

Giovanni F Misceo1, Maurice D Jones2

  • 1a Department of Psychology , International University of Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|August 30, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

When touch becomes less reliable, visual cues influence our perception of an object's size. This study on sensory precision shows vision can bias touch perception when tactile information is degraded.

Keywords:
intersensory integrationsize perceptiontouch perceptionvisual perception

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.9K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • The sensory precision hypothesis suggests that perception defaults to the most reliable sensory input.
  • Understanding how different sensory modalities integrate and influence each other is crucial for cognitive science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the sensory precision hypothesis by examining how visual and tactile size cues interact.
  • To determine if visual information biases tactile perception when touch reliability is experimentally reduced.

Main Methods:

  • Sixty college students participated in a size perception task.
  • Participants viewed one object size while manually exploring a different unseen object size, with touch reliability manipulated using bare fingers or rigid tubes.
  • Estimates of perceived size were made by matching to a visual display.

Main Results:

  • Visual size cues significantly biased tactile size estimates when the reliability of touch was decreased (using tubes).
  • This indicates that visual information can override or influence tactile perception under conditions of reduced tactile reliability.

Conclusions:

  • Findings support the sensory precision hypothesis and statistically optimal models of sensory integration.
  • The study demonstrates a clear interaction between the reliability of touch and visual bias in size perception.