Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

09:41
Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
Published on: July 19, 2019
12.1K
Pattern II and pattern III MS are entities distinct from pattern I MS: evidence from cerebrospinal fluid analysis
S Jarius1, F B König2, I Metz2
1Molecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. sven.jarius@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Journal of Neuroinflammation
|August 31, 2017
Summary
Multiple sclerosis (MS) exhibits distinct pathological patterns. Pattern II and III MS show differences in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings compared to Pattern I MS, suggesting distinct disease entities.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Immunology
- Pathology
Background:
- Multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis relies on clinical and MRI data.
- Histopathological studies reveal four MS lesion patterns, indicating potential heterogeneity.
- This heterogeneity suggests MS may encompass distinct disease entities rather than a single condition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate differences in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings between MS patterns.
- To assess intrathecal IgG synthesis in relation to MS pathological patterns.
- To differentiate MS patterns from mimics like aquaporin-4-IgG and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG disorders.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 68 lumbar punctures from patients with classified MS patterns (I, II, III).
- Evaluation of CSF findings, including oligoclonal bands (OCBs) and intrathecal IgG synthesis.
- Assessment of blood-CSF barrier function using albumin CSF/serum ratio (QAlb).
Main Results:
- Oligoclonal bands (OCBs) were significantly more prevalent in Pattern I MS (88.2%) than in Patterns II/III MS (27%).
- Intrathecal IgG response (MRZ reaction) was absent in Pattern II/III MS patients.
- Elevated albumin CSF/serum ratio (QAlb), indicating impaired blood-CSF barrier, was more frequent in Pattern II/III MS.
Conclusions:
- Pattern II and III MS patients exhibit distinct CSF profiles compared to Pattern I MS.
- Differences in intrathecal IgG synthesis and blood-CSF barrier function support distinct disease entities.
- Findings support classifying Pattern II and III MS as separate from Pattern I MS.
Keywords:
Blood-CSF barrier dysfunctionCerebrospinal fluidHistopathologyIntrathecal IgG synthesisMultiple sclerosisOligoclonal bandsPattern I lesionsPattern II lesionsPattern III lesionsQAlbQIgGTotal proteinMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences
1.5K
Inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) is a highly selective and sensitive technique for accurate elemental analysis. Though the analysis of ICP–MS mass spectra is comparatively straightforward, it is affected by spectroscopic and non-spectroscopic interferences. Spectroscopic interferences arise when the plasma contains ionic species with an m/z value the same as the analyte ion. Spectroscopic interference can be categorized as isobaric, polyatomic ions, and...
1.5K
Inductively Coupled Plasma–Mass Spectrometry (ICP–MS): Overview
2.2K
In inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS), an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) torch is used as an atomizer and ionizer. Solid samples are dissolved and volatilized before being introduced into the high-temperature argon plasma, while solution samples are nebulized and passed through the high-temperature argon plasma. Plasma dissociates the analytes and ionizes their component atoms to form a mixture of positive ions and molecular species. The positive ions are then...
2.2K

