Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity01:23

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

848
The similarity hypothesis suggests that individuals are more likely to form relationships with others who share similar attitudes, beliefs, values, and interests. This concept has been widely studied in social psychology, demonstrating that perceived similarity fosters interpersonal attraction. In an experiment supporting this hypothesis, participants were presented with fabricated information indicating that strangers held attitudes similar to their own. The results showed that participants...
848
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction01:21

Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction

286
Physical attractiveness plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal attraction, influencing first impressions, social interactions, and long-term relationship dynamics. Psychological research consistently demonstrates that attractiveness affects social evaluations and behavioral outcomes in various contexts.Influence on Social InteractionsResearch has shown that individuals perceived as physically attractive often experience preferential treatment in social and professional settings. One...
286
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

46.3K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.3K
Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity01:22

Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity

308
Proximity plays a fundamental role in shaping interpersonal attraction by increasing opportunities for interaction and fostering familiarity. Research consistently demonstrates that individuals are more likely to form social bonds with those who are physically closer to them, whether in residential settings, workplaces, or educational institutions. This effect is largely driven by the increased frequency of encounters, which facilitates the development of friendships and romantic...
308
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity01:28

Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity

318
Reciprocity in attraction is fundamental to social and romantic relationships, shaping how individuals form and maintain connections. The psychological principle underlying this phenomenon is that people tend to like those who express liking toward them. Balance theory supports this tendency, suggesting that mutual attraction fosters psychological harmony, whereas one-sided affection leads to discomfort and cognitive dissonance.The Psychological Mechanisms Behind ReciprocityWhen individuals...
318
Understanding Interpersonal Attraction01:25

Understanding Interpersonal Attraction

361
Interpersonal attraction is a fundamental psychological phenomenon influencing human relationships across various contexts. It refers to one person's positive feelings or interests toward another, serving as the foundation for friendships, romantic partnerships, familial bonds, and professional relationships. The nature of interpersonal attraction extends beyond romantic connections, shaping interactions in both short-term and long-term social engagements.Psychological Foundations of...
361

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding and challenging epistemically suspect beliefs: A call for expanding interdisciplinary research.

Journal of psychopathology and clinical science·2026
Same author

The support-deficit perspective is now the parsimonious explanation for gender differences in human mating.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Redesigning algorithms to intervene on social norm misperceptions during a national election.

Nature·2026
Same author

Large language models can detect verbal indicators of romantic attraction.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Predicting relationship quality with itself? A single general factor captures most of the variance across 34 common relationship measures.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Associations between political orientation and allyship: Evidence from potential allies and their LGBTQ+ close others.

Scientific reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

5.5K

Is Romantic Desire Predictable? Machine Learning Applied to Initial Romantic Attraction.

Samantha Joel1, Paul W Eastwick2, Eli J Finkel3,4

  • 11 Department of Psychology, University of Utah.

Psychological Science
|August 31, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predicting romantic attraction is difficult. Self-reported traits and preferences explained some desire to be liked and to like others, but not specific partner preferences in speed-dating studies.

Keywords:
attractiondatingensemble methodsmachine learningopen dataopen materialsrandom forestsromantic desireromantic relationshipsspeed datingstatistical learning

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Relationship Science

Background:

  • Theoretical perspectives on close relationships and matchmaking suggest that initial attraction is influenced by self-reported traits and preferences.
  • Understanding the predictability of romantic attraction is crucial for relationship science and matchmaking industries.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the predictive power of self-reported traits and preferences on romantic desire.
  • To differentiate between actor variance (tendency to desire others), partner variance (tendency to be desired), and relationship variance (specific partner preferences).

Main Methods:

  • Utilized machine learning (random forests) to analyze data from two speed-dating studies.
  • Participants completed over 100 self-report measures on traits and preferences relevant to mate selection.
  • Assessed predictive accuracy for actor, partner, and relationship variance in romantic desire.

Main Results:

  • Machine learning models predicted 4% to 18% of actor variance and 7% to 27% of partner variance.
  • Crucially, relationship variance, representing specific partner preferences, could not be predicted.
  • Pre-date self-reported traits and preferences showed limited ability to forecast specific romantic compatibility.

Conclusions:

  • Human mating compatibility is complex and difficult to predict solely based on pre-meeting self-reported information.
  • Initial attraction and specific partner choice involve factors beyond measurable traits and preferences.
  • Future research should explore other variables influencing relationship formation and compatibility.