Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Tools for the Real-Time Assessment of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection Model
Published on: April 6, 2021
Optimization of therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with ceftazidime and meropenem using chemostats as model for
Yanfang Feng1, Roosmarijn T Bakker, Reinier M van Hest2
1Department of Molecular Biology and Microbial Food Safety, Swammerdam Institute of Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen that can cause life-threatening infections in patients admitted to intensive care units. Resistance rapidly develops against two drugs of choice: ceftazidime and meropenem. Several therapeutic protocols were compared for reduction in viable cells and limiting development of resistance. Chemostat cultures were exposed to antibiotic concentrations measured in the blood of patients at low (5th percentile), medium (50th percentile) or high (95th percentile) levels in several therapy protocols to simulate therapy. Cultures exposed to ceftazidime recovered after 1 day at low, 2 days at medium and 3 days at high concentrations and developed corresponding levels of resistance. Patterns were very similar for meropenem except that recovery was delayed. Fluctuating levels and intermittent treatment achieved similar reduction of cell numbers at lower resistance costs. Treatment alternating ceftazidime and meropenem reduced cell numbers more than monotherapy, while strongly limiting resistance. Combination therapy was even more effective in both respects. Therapeutic goals are best reached with least risk of resistance when ceftazidime and meropenem are used in combination or alternating, at the highest concentrations the patient can endure. Monotherapy should also apply the highest concentration that is safe for the shortest time that achieves treatment objectives.
Insights
To combat Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, combination or alternating therapies with ceftazidime and meropenem are most effective. These strategies reduce bacterial load and limit antibiotic resistance development in intensive care units.
Area of Science:
- Medical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a critical opportunistic pathogen in intensive care units.
- Ceftazidime and meropenem are primary treatments, but rapid resistance development is a major challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare various therapeutic protocols for reducing Pseudomonas aeruginosa viable cells.
- To evaluate the development of antibiotic resistance under different treatment strategies.
Main Methods:
- Simulated patient therapy using chemostat cultures exposed to varying concentrations (low, medium, high) of ceftazidime and meropenem.
- Assessed bacterial recovery times and resistance levels for monotherapy, fluctuating, intermittent, alternating, and combination therapies.
Main Results:
- Monotherapy with ceftazidime or meropenem led to rapid resistance development, with longer recovery times at higher concentrations.
- Alternating and combination therapies significantly reduced bacterial cell numbers compared to monotherapy.
- Combination and alternating treatments strongly limited the development of antibiotic resistance.
Conclusions:
- Combination or alternating administration of ceftazidime and meropenem is superior for managing Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.
- Highest tolerable drug concentrations and shortest effective treatment durations are recommended, especially for monotherapy.
- Optimized therapeutic strategies are crucial for minimizing resistance in clinical settings.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Production of Antibiotics

