Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

12:00
Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Published on: May 23, 2011
265.8K
Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
Michael J Russell1, Theodore A Goodman2, Joseph M Visse1
1Aaken Laboratories, Davis, CA, United States.
Frontiers in Psychiatry
|September 1, 2017
Summary
Individual differences in brain anatomy and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) electrode choices significantly impact current delivery. This variability may explain inconsistent neuromodulation treatment outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique with potential therapeutic applications.
- Significant variability in tES treatment outcomes necessitates investigation into factors influencing current delivery.
- Individual differences in cranial morphology and tissue conductivity are hypothesized contributors to this variability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To model electrical current density at cortical targets under different tES electrode configurations and intensities.
- To assess the impact of individual anatomical variations on current delivery.
- To determine if electrode configuration and individual differences explain variability in tES outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Validated MRI modeling procedures were used to simulate electrical current flow in 23 subjects.
- Three common tES electrode configurations (non-cephalic, bi-cranial, ring) were modeled.
- Simulations were performed at three current intensities (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mA) targeting frontal and temporal cortical regions.
Main Results:
- Electrode configurations produced up to a ninefold difference in mean current densities delivered to the brain.
- The non-cephalic configuration delivered the highest current density, while the ring configuration delivered the least.
- Female subjects received significantly less current to the brain compared to male subjects.
Conclusions:
- Individual variations in cranial anatomy and tissue conductivity, alongside differing electrode configurations, significantly influence tES current delivery.
- These factors likely account for a substantial portion of the variability observed in tES clinical outcomes.
- Optimizing electrode selection and considering individual differences are crucial for reliable and effective tES neuromodulation.

