Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation01:16

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

267
Body:The statistical interpretation of bioequivalence data is a significant aspect of pharmaceutical research. Bioequivalence refers to the absence of any significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient in pharmaceutical products becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions. This helps determine if different drug products have similar absorption rates, ensuring their interchangeability.Statistical...
267
Equivalence: In Vitro and In Vivo Bioequivalence01:17

Equivalence: In Vitro and In Vivo Bioequivalence

286
Body:Bioequivalence studies are crucial in evaluating whether new drugs can match an approved one regarding pharmacological effects and clinical performance. These studies test if drugs, despite different dosage forms, share identical plasma concentration-time profiles. Three types of equivalence are central to these studies: chemical, pharmaceutical, and therapeutic. Chemical equivalence indicates that two or more drug products contain identical active ingredients in equal amounts.
286
Bioequivalence: Overview01:16

Bioequivalence: Overview

2.1K
Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...
2.1K
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers01:13

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

329
Body:In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...
329
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

300
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
300
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

333
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
333

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

National TB cohort review evaluation: insights for control strategies in low-incidence settings.

IJTLD open·2026
Same author

A randomized controlled Phase I de-escalation trial of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir combination for mild-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2026
Same author

Decision on Optimal Combinatorial Therapies in Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases using Systems approaches (DocTIS): protocol for a single-arm, adaptive basket trial in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis.

Rheumatology advances in practice·2026
Same author

A Sexual health and healthy relationships intervention for Further Education (SaFE): a synopsis of results from a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial including an assessment of the feasibility of record linkage and a health economic analysis.

Public health research (Southampton, England)·2026
Same author

Optimal Dose and Safety of Intravenous Favipiravir in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Dose-Escalating, Randomized Controlled Phase Ib Study.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2026
Same author

Paired and AB/BA Cross-Over Design in Early Phase Clinical Trials: A Closer Look at Within-Subject Variance Bias.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Simultaneous confidence regions for multivariate bioequivalence.

Philip Pallmann1, Thomas Jaki1

  • 1Medical and Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

Statistics in Medicine
|September 1, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Demonstrating bioequivalence requires multivariate analysis, not separate univariate tests, for accurate pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter assessment. This study reviews methods for simultaneous PK evaluation, highlighting challenges with real-world data.

Keywords:
James-Stein estimatorTOSTbioavailabilitylimaçon of Pascalsimultaneous inference

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K
In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
07:25

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis

Published on: May 4, 2017

18.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K
In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
07:25

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis

Published on: May 4, 2017

18.3K

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Biostatistics
  • Drug Development

Background:

  • Bioequivalence assessments often use univariate analyses for pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters like AUC and Cmax.
  • This approach overlooks the multivariate nature of analyzing multiple PK parameters from the same samples.
  • Regulatory bodies and practitioners frequently neglect simultaneous evaluation of PK measures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review methods for constructing joint confidence regions for multivariate normal means.
  • To investigate the utility of these methods in simultaneous bioequivalence problems through simulation.
  • To address the limitations of univariate analyses in bioequivalence testing.

Main Methods:

  • Review of statistical methods for joint confidence regions.
  • Simulation studies to evaluate method performance under various scenarios.
  • Analysis of PK parameter correlations and variances.
  • Application to real-world bioequivalence trial data.

Main Results:

  • Some multivariate methods perform well in idealized scenarios but struggle with real-world data complexities like unknown variance and parameter correlation.
  • The study analyzes the geometric shapes of confidence regions produced by different methods.
  • Methods for deriving marginal simultaneous confidence intervals for individual PK measures are discussed.

Conclusions:

  • Simultaneous multivariate analysis is more appropriate for demonstrating bioequivalence of multiple PK parameters.
  • Challenges exist in applying multivariate methods to real-world bioequivalence data.
  • The findings inform more robust bioequivalence assessment strategies and an R package is available.