Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood
Published on: February 11, 2017
Prevalence of Serious Emotional Disturbance Among U.S. Children: A Meta-Analysis
Nathaniel J Williams1, Lysandra Scott1, Gregory A Aarons1
1Dr. Williams and Ms. Scott are with the School of Social Work, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho. Dr. Aarons is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego.
Objective:
Prevalence estimates of child psychiatric disorders with severe impairment vary widely, and there is a critical need for precise estimates to inform clinical practice and policy in the United States. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based U.S. studies estimating the prevalence of youths with serious emotional disturbance (SED), as defined by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Methods:
Studies were identified through searches of the MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases and nine prior reviews. Two raters evaluated 423 full-text articles, and studies were included if they assessed psychopathology and functional impairment among community samples of youths (age ≤18) in the United States via structured interviews or standardized, nationally normed rating scales and if they reported point to 12-month prevalence estimates. Prevalence estimates of SED with domain-specific and global impairment were extracted, along with study characteristics and case definitions. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates; metaregression analyses tested predictors of heterogeneity.
Results:
Twelve studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of SED with domain-specific impairment was 10.06% (95% confidence interval [CI]=8.60%-11.51%, N=32,015); prevalence of SED with global impairment was 6.36% (CI=5.78%-6.93%, N=38,939). Prevalence estimates did not differ by study or sample characteristic, including representativeness of the sample (national versus regional), assessment method (taxonomic versus quantitative), or time frame (12 versus <12 months).
Conclusions:
These estimates of SED are sufficiently precise to meaningfully guide clinical decision making, mental health policy, and consideration of child psychiatry workforce needs in the United States.
More Related Videos
08:25Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment
Published on: December 6, 2024
13:08Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia
Published on: December 2, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Bullying
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Stress and Mental Health
Individuals with depression often experience challenges in both their personal and professional...
Depressive Disorders: Etiology
Biological Factors in Depression
Biological predispositions significantly influence the risk of developing depressive disorders. Genetic studies highlight the role of variations in the serotonin transporter...
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...