Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Multilevel Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease with Instability
Published on: July 25, 2025
Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and
Ali Fahir Ozer1, Tunc Oktenoglu1, Emrah Egemen1
1Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
This study found that three common dynamic stabilization systems for lumbar degenerative disc disease all yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes. Radiological results were comparable across systems, with minor complications like screw loosening or breakage requiring revision surgery.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Spinal Fusion Alternatives
- Biomechanical Engineering
Background:
- Lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a common cause of low back pain.
- Dynamic stabilization systems offer a less rigid alternative to traditional spinal fusion.
- Comparing the efficacy of different dynamic stabilization systems is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of three commonly used posterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization systems for DDD.
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Dynesys, dynamic screw with PEEK rod, and a full dynamic system (BalanC).
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 71 patients with single-level lumbar DDD received posterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization between 2011 and 2014.
- Three distinct dynamic systems were employed: Dynesys, dynamic screw with PEEK rod, and BalanC.
- Clinical and radiological data were collected preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months post-surgery.
Main Results:
- All patients demonstrated significant improvements in clinical outcomes.
- No statistically significant differences were observed in radiological outcomes among the three dynamic stabilization systems.
- Minor complications included screw loosening (2 patients) and screw breakage (1 patient), both requiring revision surgery.
Conclusions:
- All three dynamic stabilization systems evaluated provide satisfactory outcomes for patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease.
- The choice of dynamic stabilization system did not significantly impact radiological results.
- While effective, potential complications such as screw loosening or breakage should be considered.
More Related Videos
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
07:44Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
Published on: March 23, 2019