Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
Published on: April 29, 2014
Impact of a Differential Learning Approach on Practical Exam Performance: A Controlled Study in a Preclinical Dental
Sven-Olav Pabel1, Anne-Kathrin Pabel2, Jan Schmickler2
1Dr. Sven-Olav Pabel is Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology, and Cariology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany; Dr. Anne-Kathrin Pabel is a dentist in private practice, Hanau, Germany; Dr. Schmickler is a dentist in private practice, Köln, Germany; Ms. Schulz is a statistician, Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany; and Dr. Wiegand is Professor and Head, Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology, and Cariology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany. svenpabel@gmx.de.
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to evaluate if differential learning in a preclinical dental course impacted the performance of dental students in a practical exam (preparation of a gold partial crown) immediately after the training session and 20 weeks later compared to conventional learning. This controlled study was performed in a preclinical course in operative dentistry at a dental school in Germany. Third-year students were trained in preparing gold partial crowns by using either the conventional learning (n=41) or the differential learning approach (n=32). The differential learning approach consisted of 20 movement exercises with a continuous change of movement execution during the learning session, while the conventional learning approach was mainly based on repetition, a methodological series of exercises, and correction of preparations during the training phase. Practical exams were performed immediately after the training session (T1) and 20 weeks later (T2, retention test). Preparations were rated by four independent and blinded examiners. At T1, no significant difference between the performance (exam passed) of the two groups was detected (conventional learning: 54.3%, differential learning: 68.0%). At T2, significantly more students passed the exam when trained by the differential learning approach (68.8%) than by the conventional learning approach (18.9%). Interrater reliability was moderate (Kappa: 0.57, T1) or substantial (Kappa: 0.67, T2), respectively. These results suggest that a differential learning approach can increase the manual skills of dental students.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Differential Staining Technique
Teeth
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.

