Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Measuring Biophysical and Psychological Stress Levels Following Visitation to Three Locations with Differing Levels of Nature
Published on: June 19, 2019
The National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network Access to Parks Indicator: A National County-Level Measure
Emily Neusel Ussery1, Leah Yngve1, Dee Merriam1
1Emily Neusel Ussery is with the Epidemic Intelligence Service, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services and Healthy Community Design Initiative, Division of Environmental and Emergency Health Services, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Leah Yngve, Dee Merriam, and Geoffrey Whitfield are with the Healthy Community Design Initiative, Division of Environmental and Emergency Health Services, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Stephanie Foster is with the Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Arthur Wendel is with the Division of Community Health Investigations, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Tegan Boehmer is with the Healthy Community Design Initiative, Division of Environmental and Emergency Health Services, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Abstract:
Parks and recreation departments and public health organizations both work to improve the well-being of their communities. Measuring residential proximity to parks could be a specific area of shared interest, given that proximity to parks is needed for walking access, and the use of parks is, in turn, associated with many physical, social, and mental health benefits. The CDC's publicly available National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (NEPHTN) Access to Parks Indicator (API) focuses on one major component of access, residential proximity to parks. The API uses a commercial parks database and U.S. Census data to estimate the number and percentage of individuals in the U.S. that live within a half-mile of a park boundary, a measure commonly used to represent park proximity. The API is calculated at the state and county levels and is available for all states and counties in the U.S. Using estimates from the API, we examined the distribution of residential proximity to parks by geography and race/ethnicity. Additionally, we evaluated differences in park proximity by rural/urban status of counties. In 2010, 39% of the total U.S. population lived within a half-mile of a park. This percentage varied widely between states, ranging from 9% in West Virginia to 67% in Hawaii and 88% in the District of Columbia (DC). Park proximity was lowest among non-Hispanic whites (34.2%) and highest among individuals belonging to the non-Hispanic other race category (52.0%). Metropolitan counties had the highest percentage of residents living within a half-mile of a park (43.3%); the percentage was lower in non-metropolitan counties adjacent to a metropolitan county (15.0%) and non-metropolitan counties not adjacent to a metropolitan county (18.5%). Park proximity was higher in metropolitan counties with a larger population size and in non-metropolitan counties with a higher degree of urbanization. The NEPHTN Access to Parks Indicator provides an opportunity to understand park proximity in counties and states throughout the U.S., including identifying disparities that may exist between population subgroups and comparing geographic areas. Parks and recreational professionals can use this information to compare their county or state to other geographic areas and, in combination with local data on parks within their jurisdiction, inform decisions to improve the distribution of parks and the well-being of their communities.
Related Concept Videos
Levels of Use of a GIS
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
Relative Risk
Ordinal Level of Measurement
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...

