Clinical Use of Centrifugal Pumps and the Roller Pump in Open Heart Surgery: A Comparative Evaluation

Masaru Yoshikai1, Masakatsu Hamada1, Kyoumi Takarabe1

  • 1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Koga Hospital, Kurume; and * Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan.

Artificial Organs
|September 5, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Centrifugal pumps showed fewer negative effects on blood and coagulation compared to roller pumps during heart surgery. Specifically, centrifugal pumps reduced thrombin generation, indicating a potential benefit for patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Hematology

Background:

  • Centrifugal pumps are preferred in open-heart surgery for minimizing blood damage.
  • Reducing coagulation system activation is a key goal in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of two centrifugal pumps and one roller pump on blood elements and the coagulation system.
  • To evaluate the impact on complements and immunoglobulins during CPB.

Main Methods:

  • Used Lifestream and BP-80 centrifugal pumps, and a Mera Co. roller pump in 29 CPB patients.
  • Measured platelet counts, lactate dehydrogenase, antithrombin III, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), complements (C3, C4, CH50), and immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM) pre- and post-CPB.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences were observed in most parameters between the pump types.
  • Thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) levels increased less with centrifugal pumps compared to the roller pump.

Conclusions:

  • Centrifugal pumps may suppress thrombin synthesis more effectively than roller pumps.
  • This suggests centrifugal pumps could offer advantages in managing coagulation during CPB.

Related Concept Videos