Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.4K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.4K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

888
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
888
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.2K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.2K
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

12.7K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
12.7K
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

283
Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
283

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) for differentiating tumour recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated intra-axial brain tumours.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same author

The impact of data driven motion correction for clinical brain PET/MRI radiotracers.

EJNMMI physics·2026
Same author

MEK inhibition in adult patients with pilocytic astrocytomas.

NPJ precision oncology·2026
Same author

Surgical complications after therapeutic lymph node dissection in stage III-IV melanoma: impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2026
Same author

Awake pediatric brain-MRI: a fast multi-sequence scan augmented with motion compensated single-shot 2D acquisitions.

Radiology advances·2025
Same author

Differentiation of Molecular Glioblastomas and Lower-grade Diffuse Astrocytomas Using MRI Perfusion and Diffusion Parameters.

Clinical neuroradiology·2025
Same journal

Corrigendum.

Anticancer research·2026
Same journal

Geographic Variation in Stage at Diagnosis of Skin Cancer in the United States: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Anticancer research·2026
Same journal

Anti-tumor Effects of Loureirin A Treatment in Colorectal Cancer Cells <i>via</i> Inhibition of AKT Phosphorylation.

Anticancer research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian Analysis to Refine East Asian Subgroup Estimates in the CLEAR Trial (Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab <i>vs</i>. Sunitinib) for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Anticancer research·2026
Same journal

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Increases Doxorubicin-induced Mitotic Slippage in MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells.

Anticancer research·2026
Same journal

Geographic Disparities in Socioeconomic Factors and Advanced-stage Presentation in Rectosigmoid Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Anticancer research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Inconsistent Reporting Between Meta-analysis Protocol and Publication - A Cross-Sectional Study.

Alberto Falk Delgado1, Anna Falk Delgado2

  • 1Department of Surgical Sciences, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Anticancer Research
|September 6, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Discrepancies between registered protocols and published reports are common in oncology drug meta-analyses. This study found frequent inconsistencies in reporting, highlighting a need for improved transparency in research.

Keywords:
Meta-analysis protocolinconsistent reportingpublished reporttrial registration

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Clinical trial reporting standards

Background:

  • Inconsistent reporting between meta-analysis protocols and published findings is a significant concern.
  • Understanding these discrepancies is crucial for reliable scientific evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the extent and nature of inconsistencies between registered protocols and published reports in oncology drug meta-analyses.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional study analyzed oncology drug meta-analyses published in 2016 with available protocols.
  • Data extraction focused on selection criteria, outcomes, and statistical plans.
  • Investigators also noted self-acknowledged inconsistencies.

Main Results:

  • Only 19% of oncology drug meta-analyses had registered protocols.
  • Among those with protocols, 70% exhibited reporting inconsistencies (e.g., PICO, statistics).
  • Half of the inconsistent studies acknowledged changes between protocol and publication.

Conclusions:

  • Frequent discrepancies exist between registered protocols and published reports in oncology drug meta-analyses.
  • This highlights a need for enhanced adherence to registered protocols to improve research integrity.