Patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed without coronary revascularization: A
Alberto Menozzi1, Stefano De Servi2, Roberta Rossini3
1Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma, Italy.
Insights
Many patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) are medically managed and face higher risks. Optimizing pharmacological treatment, including dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), is crucial for improving outcomes in this population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) represent a heterogeneous patient group with varying prognoses.
- A significant proportion of NSTE-ACS patients are managed medically without revascularization, exhibiting higher risks of adverse cardiovascular events.
- Current medical management and guideline adherence are suboptimal in a substantial number of these patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the characteristics and management of medically treated NSTE-ACS patients.
- To highlight the risks associated with conservative management in NSTE-ACS.
- To emphasize the importance of optimizing pharmacological treatment, including dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), in this patient subgroup.
Main Methods:
- Review of data from large registries (EYSHOT, FAST-MI) focusing on NSTE-ACS patient management.
- Analysis of patient subgroups within medically managed NSTE-ACS, including those not undergoing angiography or revascularization.
- Assessment of pharmacological treatment patterns and recommendations for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).
Main Results:
- Medically managed NSTE-ACS patients demonstrate a worse prognosis compared to those revascularized.
- These patients are less likely to receive guideline-recommended pharmacological treatments.
- There is a need to increase the proportion of patients discharged with DAPT and consider ticagrelor over clopidogrel in select cases.
Conclusions:
- Careful selection is essential for NSTE-ACS patients managed conservatively without coronary angiography.
- Optimizing pharmacological therapy, particularly DAPT, is mandatory for improving outcomes in medically managed NSTE-ACS patients.
- Consideration of coronary anatomy, comorbidities, and patient frailty is vital in treatment strategy decisions.
Abstract:
NSTE-ACS patients are a heterogeneous population, with different clinical features and prognosis. A large proportion of them is medically managed, without any revascularization. In the EYSHOT and FAST-MI registries such patients were 40% and 35%, respectively. These patients are at higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events and have a worse prognosis compared with those receiving revascularization. Medically managed NSTE-ACS patients consist of different subgroups: those not undergoing coronary angiography, those without significant coronary artery disease, and those with coronary stenoses not referred to revascularization. Patients with NSTE-ACS for whom a conservative strategy without coronary angiogram is planned must be very carefully selected. In patients with comorbidities, frailty, or advanced age, a careful balance between benefits and risks is needed to choice the management strategy (perform or not coronary angiography and/or revascularization), as evidence-based medicine data are lacking in the setting of frailty and comorbidities. In this decisional process, it should be also taken into consideration the role of coronary anatomy in risk stratification and treatment guidance. NSTE-ACS patients managed without revascularization less frequently receive guideline-recommended pharmacological treatment. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended for 12months also in medically managed patients, after careful balancing of ischemic and bleeding risk. In these patients it is mandatory to optimize pharmacological treatment, including antiplatelet therapy, to improve outcome. In NSTE-ACS medically managed, the proportion of patients discharged with DAPT should be increased in comparison with current practice, and the use of ticagrelor in place of clopidogrel should be considered in selected patients.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
07:59Acetylcholine Re-Challenge After Intracoronary Nitroglycerine Administration
Published on: April 4, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Angina V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
