Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
Published on: November 9, 2016
Appropriateness of Bolus Antihypertensive Therapy for Elevated Blood Pressure in the Emergency Department
Joseph B Miller1, Andrew Arter2, Suprat S Wilson2
1Henry Ford Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Insights
Over one-third of emergency department patients received intravenous antihypertensive treatment inappropriately. This highlights a need for better education and protocols to reduce wasteful spending on blood pressure management.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Elevated blood pressure (BP) is common in emergency departments (EDs), but true hypertensive emergencies are rare.
- Inappropriate intravenous (IV) antihypertensive treatment for elevated BP without a hypertensive emergency is a concern.
- This study aimed to determine the frequency of such inappropriate treatment in ED patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the frequency of inappropriate intravenous antihypertensive medication administration in emergency department patients with elevated blood pressure.
- To identify potential areas for resource savings through improved clinical practice and protocol development.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 357 patients aged 18-89 receiving IV antihypertensive treatment in an urban teaching hospital ED.
- Treatment was defined as inappropriate if no documented suspicion of a cardiovascular condition or acute end-organ injury was present.
- Data included adverse events and 30-day readmission rates; analysis was descriptive.
Main Results:
- 36.4% of patients (127/357) received inappropriate IV antihypertensive treatment.
- Labetalol was the most common medication used (61%).
- No significant differences in adverse events (hypotension, bradycardia), survival, or 30-day ED revisits were observed between appropriate and inappropriate treatment groups.
Conclusions:
- More than one in three patients received IV antihypertensive therapy inappropriately in the ED.
- Improved provider education and standardized BP treatment protocols could lead to significant resource savings.
- The findings suggest a need for stricter adherence to guidelines for antihypertensive medication use in the ED setting.
Introduction:
While moderate to severely elevated blood pressure (BP) is present in nearly half of all emergency department (ED) patients, the incidence of true hypertensive emergencies in ED patients is low. Administration of bolus intravenous (IV) antihypertensive treatment to lower BP in patients without a true hypertensive emergency is a wasteful practice that is discouraged by hypertension experts; however, anecdotal evidence suggests this occurs with relatively high frequency. Accordingly, we sought to assess the frequency of inappropriate IV antihypertensive treatment in ED patients with elevated BP absent a hypertensive emergency.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective cohort study from a single, urban, teaching hospital. Using pharmacy records, we identified patients age 18-89 who received IV antihypertensive treatment in the ED. We defined treatment as inappropriate if documented suspicion for an indicated cardiovascular condition or acute end-organ injury was lacking. Data abstraction included adverse events and 30-day readmission rates, and analysis was primarily descriptive.
Results:
We included a total of 357 patients over an 18-month period. The mean age was 55; 51% were male and 93% black, and 127 (36.4%) were considered inappropriately treated. Overall, labetalol (61%) was the most commonly used medication, followed by enalaprilat (18%), hydralazine (18%), and metoprolol (3%). There were no significant differences between appropriate and inappropriate BP treatment groups in terms of clinical characteristics or adverse events. Hypotension or bradycardia occurred in three (2%) patients in the inappropriate treatment cohort and in two (1%) patients in the appropriately treated cohort. Survival to discharge and 30-day ED revisit rates were equivalent.
Conclusion:
More than one in three patients who were given IV bolus antihypertensive treatment in the ED received such therapy inappropriately by our definition, suggesting that significant resources could perhaps be saved through education of providers and development of clearly defined BP treatment protocols.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Hypertension I: Introduction
Drug Delivery: Enteral Route
Antihypertensive Drugs: Action of Diuretics
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Hypertension V: Nursing Management

