Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...

Chi-square Analysis

Chi-square Analysis

The chi-square test is a statistical hypothesis test. It is used to check whether there is a significant difference between an expected value and an observed value. In the context of genetics, it enables us to either accept or reject a hypothesis, based on how much the observed values deviate from the expected values.
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...

Statistical Significance

Statistical Significance

Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...

Gene Flow

Gene Flow

Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Causal Inference in Plant Disease Contexts.

Annual review of phytopathology·2026

Same author

Marginal causal effect of fungicide seed treatments on soybean yield and uncertain profitability in the US Midwest.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Automated detection and quantification of two-spotted spider mite life stages using computer vision for high-throughput in vitro assays.

PloS one·2025

Same author

How Do Growers Respond to Host Resistance? A Conditional Gaussian Bayesian Network for Causal Inference of Fungicide Cost Savings.

Phytopathology·2025

Same author

Plant-parasitic nematodes on hemp in the Pacific Northwest of the United States.

Journal of cannabis research·2025

Same author

Development of a Translation Elongation Factor 1-Alpha (TEF)-Based TaqMan qPCR Assay for <i>Diaporthe humulicola</i>, the Causal Agent of Halo Blight of Hop.

Plant disease·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Quantification of Fungal Colonization, Sporogenesis, and Production of Mycotoxins Using Kernel Bioassays

Quantification of Fungal Colonization, Sporogenesis, and Production of Mycotoxins Using Kernel Bioassays

Published on: April 23, 2012

Statistical Power in Plant Pathology Research.

David H Gent¹, Paul D Esker¹, Alissa B Kriss¹

¹First author: U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, and Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis 97331; second author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, Penn State University, University Park 16802; and third author: Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC 27409.

|September 7, 2017

Summary

Statistical power is crucial for accurate scientific findings. Low power increases the risk of Type II errors, where real treatment effects are missed, leading to uncertain conclusions in research.

More Related Videos

Establishment of a Chilli Thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood) Rearing System for Virulence Screening of Entomopathogenic Fungi

Establishment of a Chilli Thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood) Rearing System for Virulence Screening of Entomopathogenic Fungi

Published on: July 18, 2025

An Easy and Flexible Inoculation Method for Accurately Assessing Powdery Mildew-Infection Phenotypes of Arabidopsis and Other Plants

An Easy and Flexible Inoculation Method for Accurately Assessing Powdery Mildew-Infection Phenotypes of Arabidopsis and Other Plants

Published on: March 9, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Quantification of Fungal Colonization, Sporogenesis, and Production of Mycotoxins Using Kernel Bioassays

Quantification of Fungal Colonization, Sporogenesis, and Production of Mycotoxins Using Kernel Bioassays

Published on: April 23, 2012

Establishment of a Chilli Thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood) Rearing System for Virulence Screening of Entomopathogenic Fungi

Establishment of a Chilli Thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood) Rearing System for Virulence Screening of Entomopathogenic Fungi

Published on: July 18, 2025

An Easy and Flexible Inoculation Method for Accurately Assessing Powdery Mildew-Infection Phenotypes of Arabidopsis and Other Plants

An Easy and Flexible Inoculation Method for Accurately Assessing Powdery Mildew-Infection Phenotypes of Arabidopsis and Other Plants

Published on: March 9, 2021

Area of Science:

Statistical methodology
Research design

Background:

Failure to reject the null hypothesis can indicate no significant effect or a Type II error (false negative).
Type II errors are more likely in studies with insufficient statistical power.
Low statistical power is common in scientific literature, including plant pathology, hindering interpretation of nonsignificant results.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight the importance of statistical power in hypothesis testing.
To explain the factors influencing statistical power and strategies to increase it.
To emphasize the role of power analysis in experimental planning and interpretation of results.

Main Methods:

The abstract discusses the concept of statistical power (1 - probability of Type II errors).
It outlines factors affecting power: effect size, variance, sample size, and significance criterion (alpha).
Common strategies to enhance power are presented, such as increasing sample size and reducing variability.

Main Results:

Low statistical power is prevalent and rarely reported, causing uncertainty in research conclusions.
Studies with power less than 0.5 are generally not recommended for conclusive results.
Adequately powered studies yield more reliable conclusions, especially for small effect sizes.

Conclusions:

Power analysis is essential during the planning phase of experiments to ensure robust and interpretable results.
Emphasizing statistical power leads to more efficient resource allocation and better-structured hypotheses.
Adequate statistical power minimizes erroneous conclusions and overestimation of treatment effects.