Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.4K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

43.7K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
43.7K
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity01:28

Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity

318
Reciprocity in attraction is fundamental to social and romantic relationships, shaping how individuals form and maintain connections. The psychological principle underlying this phenomenon is that people tend to like those who express liking toward them. Balance theory supports this tendency, suggesting that mutual attraction fosters psychological harmony, whereas one-sided affection leads to discomfort and cognitive dissonance.The Psychological Mechanisms Behind ReciprocityWhen individuals...
318
Conformity01:20

Conformity

48.3K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
48.3K
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

541
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
541
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

40.8K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intentions poorly explain how and why people engage in offensive and defensive forms of violence.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Impact of wet- and dry-lab workflows on genome assembly, typing and enterotoxin gene detection in whole-genome sequencing of foodborne Staphylococcus aureus.

International journal of food microbiology·2026
Same author

The ecological origins of collectivism and individualism.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

Integrating Statistical and Machine-Learning Approaches for <i>Salmonella enterica</i> Surveillance in Northwestern Italy: A One Health Data-Driven Framework.

Microorganisms·2025
Same author

Investigation of <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> in Food in Northwestern Italy (2020-2024).

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Honour, competition and cooperation across 13 societies.

Nature human behaviour·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K

Reciprocity Outperforms Conformity to Promote Cooperation.

Angelo Romano1,2, Daniel Balliet2

  • 11 Department of Psychology, University of Torino.

Psychological Science
|September 7, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Reciprocity, the tendency to return favors, more strongly influences human cooperation than conformity, the tendency to follow group behavior. This suggests reputation concerns drive cooperation more than social norms.

Keywords:
conformitycooperationcultureevolutionopen dataopen materialsreciprocity

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.3K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Human cooperation is pervasive, even among non-relatives.
  • Two proposed mechanisms are reciprocity and conformity.
  • Understanding the dominance of these mechanisms is key to explaining cooperation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the influence of reciprocity versus conformity on cooperation.
  • To investigate cooperation when reciprocity and conformity suggest different actions.
  • To explore the role of reputation in conformity.

Main Methods:

  • Three studies were conducted observing participants' cooperative behavior.
  • Participants received information about a partner's past behavior.
  • Participants also received information about group members' past behavior with that partner.

Main Results:

  • Participants demonstrated both reciprocity and conformity.
  • Reciprocity was found to have a stronger effect on cooperation than conformity.
  • Conformity was partially explained by reputational concerns.

Conclusions:

  • Reciprocity is a more dominant driver of cooperation than conformity.
  • Reputational concerns may underlie conformity, aligning it with a reciprocity framework.
  • These findings deepen our understanding of the evolutionary basis of human cooperation.