Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

1.5K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.5K
Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution: Problem Solving01:20

Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution: Problem Solving

3.0K
Individual molecules in a gas move in random directions, but a gas containing numerous molecules has a predictable distribution of molecular speeds, which is known as the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, f(v).
This distribution function f(v) is defined by saying that the expected number N (v1,v2) of particles with speeds between v1 and v2 is given by
3.0K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

8.7K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
8.7K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

4.2K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
4.2K
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

4.6K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
4.6K
Aggregates Classification01:29

Aggregates Classification

1.1K
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multivariate pattern analysis detects distinct neural representations of fMRI-based lateralized neurofeedback for cognitive reappraisal training in major depressive disorder.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Higher-order synergy-based ranking in transcriptomic communities via latent factors and O-information.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Lifespan development of EEG alpha and aperiodic component sources is shaped by the connectome and axonal delays.

National science review·2026
Same author

Laminar CBV and BOLD response characteristics over time and space in the human primary somatosensory cortex at 7T.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

EEG Signatures of COVID-19 Survival compared to close contacts and the Cuban EEG normative database.

Clinical neurophysiology practice·2026
Same author

A Feasibility Study of Navigating Emotional States Using Real-Time Representational Similarity Analysis fMRI Neurofeedback.

International journal of neural systems·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.4K

Fast Gaussian Naïve Bayes for searchlight classification analysis.

Marlis Ontivero-Ortega1, Agustin Lage-Castellanos2, Giancarlo Valente3

  • 1Department of NeuroInformatics, Cuban Center for Neuroscience, Cuba.

Neuroimage
|September 7, 2017
PubMed
Summary

A new Gaussian Naive Bayes classifier (massive-GNB) speeds up whole-brain searchlight analysis in neuroimaging. This efficient method achieves comparable accuracy to support vector machines for cluster-level analysis, facilitating broader use of this technique.

Keywords:
Gaussian Naïve BayesPermutation testsSearchlight MVPASupport vector machine

More Related Videos

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors
05:16

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Published on: October 15, 2014

25.8K
ARL Spectral Fitting as an Application to Augment Spectral Data via Franck-Condon Lineshape Analysis and Color Analysis
07:11

ARL Spectral Fitting as an Application to Augment Spectral Data via Franck-Condon Lineshape Analysis and Color Analysis

Published on: August 19, 2021

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.4K
Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors
05:16

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Published on: October 15, 2014

25.8K
ARL Spectral Fitting as an Application to Augment Spectral Data via Franck-Condon Lineshape Analysis and Color Analysis
07:11

ARL Spectral Fitting as an Application to Augment Spectral Data via Franck-Condon Lineshape Analysis and Color Analysis

Published on: August 19, 2021

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Machine Learning in Neuroscience
  • Brain Activity Analysis

Background:

  • Searchlight analysis, a multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) technique, examines neural activity across numerous brain regions.
  • Computational costs, particularly for statistical significance testing with permutation methods, limit the widespread application of searchlight analysis.
  • Existing classifiers like Support Vector Machines (SVM) are computationally intensive for exhaustive whole-brain searchlight analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel, computationally efficient implementation of the Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) classifier for searchlight analysis, termed massive-GNB.
  • To evaluate the speed and accuracy of massive-GNB compared to traditional methods, specifically SVM, in an fMRI localizer experiment.
  • To assess the utility of massive-GNB for detecting specific brain regions, such as the lateral occipital complex (LOC).

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of a massively parallel Gaussian Naive Bayes classifier (massive-GNB) for simultaneous classification across all searchlights.
  • Comparison of massive-GNB and SVM accuracy in detecting the lateral occipital complex (LOC) using fMRI data from 26 subjects.
  • Validation against a meta-analytically defined LOC to assess classifier error rates and selectivity.

Main Results:

  • Massive-GNB demonstrated a substantial speed advantage over SVM and previous GNB implementations.
  • While SVM showed slightly higher accuracy and selectivity in individual searchlights, both massive-GNB and SVM performed equivalently after cluster-level multiple comparison correction.
  • The massive-GNB classifier achieved comparable accuracy to more complex classifiers at the cluster level, with significantly reduced computational time.

Conclusions:

  • Massive-GNB offers a computationally efficient alternative for searchlight analysis, yielding results comparable to SVM at the cluster level.
  • The speed gains of massive-GNB make it a practical tool for large-scale neuroimaging analyses, potentially increasing the adoption of searchlight techniques.
  • Massive-GNB is available as a public Matlab toolbox, promoting its accessibility and use within the research community.