Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Culture of Bladder Cancer Organoids as Precision Medicine Tools
Published on: December 28, 2021
Assembling and validating data from multiple sources to study care for Veterans with bladder cancer
Florian R Schroeck1,2,3,4, Brenda Sirovich5,6, John D Seigne7,8
1White River Junction VA Medical Center, 215 N Main Street, White River Junction, VT, 05009, USA. florian.r.schroeck@dartmouth.edu.
Background:
Despite the high prevalence of bladder cancer, research on optimal bladder cancer care is limited. One way to advance observational research on care is to use linked data from multiple sources. Such big data research can provide real-world details of care and outcomes across a large number of patients. We assembled and validated such data including (1) administrative data from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), (2) Medicare claims, (3) data abstracted by tumor registrars, (4) data abstracted via chart review from the national electronic health record, and (5) full text pathology reports.
Methods:
Based on these combined data, we used administrative data to identify patients with newly diagnosed bladder cancer who received care in the VA. To validate these data, we first compared the diagnosis date from the administrative data to that from the tumor registry. Second, we measured accuracy of identifying bladder cancer care in VA administrative data, using a random chart review (n = 100) as gold standard. Lastly, we compared the proportion of patients who received bladder cancer care among those who did versus did not have full text bladder pathology reports available, expecting that those with reports are significantly more likely to receive care in VA.
Results:
Out of 26,675 patients, 11,323 (42%) had tumor registry data available. 90% of these patients had a difference of 90 days or less between the diagnosis dates from administrative and registry data. Among 100 patients selected for chart review, 59 received bladder cancer care in VA, 58 of which were correctly identified using administrative data (sensitivity 98%, specificity 90%). Receipt of bladder cancer care was substantially more common among those who did versus did not have bladder pathology available (96% vs. 43%, p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Merging administrative with electronic health record and pathology data offers new possibilities to validate the use of administrative data in bladder cancer research.
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System I: Health History
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies
Anatomy of the Genitourinary System II: Bladder and Urethra

