Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

371
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
371
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

50.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
50.2K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.1K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.1K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

39.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.8K
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

284
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
284
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Public communication alters private confidence.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Octopamine and tyramine dynamics predict learning rate phenotypes during associative conditioning in honey bees.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Dopamine and serotonin transients predict depressive symptom relief following deep brain stimulation of human subcallosal cingulate cortex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Caudate serotonin signaling during social exchange distinguishes essential tremor and Parkinson's disease patients.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Scenes from a Marriage: How We Found Our Way from Experimental Psychology to Social Neuroscience.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same author

Communicated priors tune the perception of control.

Cognition·2024
Same journal

Desert lizards modulate nutritional responses to match seasonal biological needs.

Royal Society open science·2026
Same journal

Multi-generational fidelity, ecological and social determinants of roosting in a cooperatively breeding bird (<i>Argya squamiceps</i>).

Royal Society open science·2025
Same journal

Multifaceted polarization and information reliability in climate change discussions on social media platforms.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same journal

Comparing the kinematics related to inflicted head injury between violent shaking of a 6-week-old and a 1-year-old infant surrogate.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same journal

Partner choice increases observed reciprocity-based cooperation but decreases unobserved stake-based cooperation.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same journal

Importation models for travel-related SARS-CoV-2 cases reported in Newfoundland and Labrador during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Royal Society open science·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K

Making better decisions in groups.

Dan Bang1,2, Chris D Frith1,3

  • 1Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.

Royal Society Open Science
|September 8, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Decision-making is prone to hidden biases, but group collaboration can improve outcomes. Diverse groups enhance problem-solving by exploring more hypotheses, though managing group dynamics is key for optimal decisions.

Keywords:
Bayesianbiasconfidencedecision-makingdiversitysocial

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Decision-making processes in individuals and groups are complex, often influenced by cognitive biases.
  • Understanding the interplay between past experience, new evidence, and hypothesis exploration is crucial.
  • Bayesian frameworks offer a model for how individuals update beliefs and consider actions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and identify common decision-making problems in both individual and group contexts.
  • To explain decision-making through a Bayesian lens, incorporating experience, evidence, and hypothesis space exploration.
  • To highlight the benefits and challenges of group decision-making, particularly concerning diversity.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of decision-making problems and cognitive biases.
  • Application of a Bayesian framework to model belief updating and action selection.
  • Analysis of group dynamics, diversity, and potential pitfalls in collective decision-making.

Main Results:

  • Unconscious biases frequently impact decision-making efficiency, often leading to suboptimal actions.
  • Group decision-making can mitigate individual biases and improve the exploration of potential solutions.
  • Group diversity can enhance problem-solving but introduces unique management challenges.

Conclusions:

  • Awareness of cognitive biases is essential for improving individual decision-making.
  • Group collaboration, especially with diverse members, offers advantages in complex problem-solving.
  • Effective management strategies are needed to harness the benefits of diverse group decision-making.