Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

570
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
570
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.6K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Arthrospira platensis-derived phycocyanin on blood cells1.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2022
Same author

Differences in human and sheep platelet adherence, aggregation and activation induced by glass beads in a modified chandler loop-system.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2021
Same author

Differences in human and minipig platelet number, volume and activation induced by borosilicate glass beads in a modified chandler loop-system.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2021
Same author

Cutaneous microcirculation in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Comparison of capillary blood circulation in the nail fold of finger and toe.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2020
Same author

HELP-(Heparin-induced Extracorporeal LDL Precipitation)-apheresis in heart recipients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy and concomitant hypercholesterolemia: Influence of long-term treatment on the microcirculation.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2019
Same author

Growth-related micromorphological characteristics of the porcine femoral artery.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2019
Same journal

Blood viscosity values for predicting pathological stroke types (ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and stroke mimic) at DR. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2026
Same journal

Adaptations of blood fluidity markers to progressive resistance training in men.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2026
Same journal

Changes in whole blood viscosity in patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical intervention for aortic stenosis.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2026
Same journal

Impairment of cutaneous microcirculation and vasoreactivity in primary hypothyroidism.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2026
Same journal

Blood viscosity in clinical practice: A critical review of diagnostic utility, therapeutic implications, and evidence gaps.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of an oral Beta-caryophyllene Indena Phytosome<sup>®</sup> for the treatment of pain and inflammation in interstitial cystitis.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
09:18

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.5K

Reference range and variability of Laser-Doppler-Fluxmetry.

C Mrowietz1, R P Franke2, G Pindur1

  • 1Institute for Clinical Hemostaseology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation
|September 9, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study establishes reference ranges for the new DOP-system Laser Doppler Fluxmetry (LDF) to reliably assess skin blood flow. Results show no seasonal or daily variation, enabling accurate diagnosis of microcirculatory disorders.

Keywords:
Laser Doppler Fluxreference rangeskin perfusionvariability

More Related Videos

A Novel Approach to Overcome Movement Artifact When Using a Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging System for Alternating Speeds of Blood Microcirculation
07:20

A Novel Approach to Overcome Movement Artifact When Using a Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging System for Alternating Speeds of Blood Microcirculation

Published on: August 30, 2017

8.9K
Evaluation of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation in the Rat Using Laser Doppler Flowmetry
07:12

Evaluation of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation in the Rat Using Laser Doppler Flowmetry

Published on: January 19, 2020

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
09:18

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.5K
A Novel Approach to Overcome Movement Artifact When Using a Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging System for Alternating Speeds of Blood Microcirculation
07:20

A Novel Approach to Overcome Movement Artifact When Using a Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging System for Alternating Speeds of Blood Microcirculation

Published on: August 30, 2017

8.9K
Evaluation of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation in the Rat Using Laser Doppler Flowmetry
07:12

Evaluation of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation in the Rat Using Laser Doppler Flowmetry

Published on: January 19, 2020

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Physiology
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Laser Doppler Fluxmetry (LDF) is a noninvasive technique for measuring skin blood flow, widely used in research and clinical settings.
  • The new DOP-system offers enhanced capabilities by analyzing frequency spectra across four distinct velocity windows, targeting venules, capillaries, and arteries.
  • Sufficient evaluation of LDF's diagnostic reliability and effectiveness, including reference ranges and parameter variability, is crucial for clinical applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic reliability and effectiveness of the new DOP-system Laser Doppler Fluxmetry (LDF).
  • To establish reference ranges and assess the variability of LDF measurements for accurate interpretation in medical diagnostics and therapy control.

Main Methods:

  • Four studies were conducted to determine reference ranges in 62 healthy subjects.
  • Circadian, day-to-day, and yearly variability of LDF measurements were assessed in small subject groups (8 and 6 participants).
  • Measurements utilized the new DOP-system, analyzing frequency spectra across four velocity windows.

Main Results:

  • Reference ranges for the DOP-system LDF were established.
  • No significant dependence of measured data on the day or season of measurement was found.
  • Circadian and day-to-day variability were evaluated.

Conclusions:

  • The established reference ranges for the DOP-system LDF enable the diagnosis of microcirculatory disorders.
  • The lack of seasonal or daily dependence simplifies standardized measurement procedures.
  • This study provides essential data for the valid interpretation of LDF values in individual patients.