Comparative effectiveness of azithromycin for treating scrub typhus: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and
Szu-Chia Lee1, Yu-Jyun Cheng, Chao-Hsu Lin
1Department of Pediatrics, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu City Department of Pediatrics, MacKay Children's Hospital, Taipei MacKay Medical College, New Taipei Department of Medical Technology, Jen-Teh Junior college of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Miaoli Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University Biobank Management Center of the Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Department of Pathology and Graduate Institute of Pathology and Parasitology, the Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Graduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Hsinchu Mackay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu City, Taiwan Division of Infection and Pathway Medicine, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, the University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Background:
Scrub typhus is a zoonotic disease that remains an important health threat in endemic areas. Appropriate anti-rickettsial treatment ensures a successful recovery. Doxycycline is a recommended drug, but it is contraindicated in pregnant women and young children. Azithromycin is a safer alternative drug, but its effectiveness remains largely unclear. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of azithromycin.
Methods:
Studies that investigated azithromycin in treating scrub typhus were systematically identified from electronic databases up to December 2016. Information regarding study population, disease severity, treatment protocols, and responses was extracted and analyzed.
Results:
In this review, 5 studies were included, which comprised a total of 427 patients. When comparing the treatment failure rate, we observed a favorable outcome in patients treated with azithromycin (risk ratio [RR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-2.98). However, patients in the azithromycin group had longer time to defervescence (mean difference 4.38 hours, 95% CI -2.51 to 11.27) and higher rate of fever for more than 48 hours (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.81-2.12). Moreover, patients treated with azithromycin had less adverse effects (RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.42-1.52).
Conclusions:
Azithromycin is as effective as other anti-rickettsial drugs with higher treatment success rates, lower frequency of adverse effects, and longer time to defervescence (GRADE 2B). Therefore, it is reasonable to use azithromycin as the first-line treatment against scrub typhus. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the effectiveness of azithromycin in specific patient groups, at high dose and influence of drug resistance.
More Related Videos
09:09High Throughput, Real-time, Dual-readout Testing of Intracellular Antimicrobial Activity and Eukaryotic Cell Cytotoxicity
Published on: November 16, 2016
09:34An Automated Culture System for Use in Preclinical Testing of Host-Directed Therapies for Tuberculosis
Published on: August 16, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
