Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.5K
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

520
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
520
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.5K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the uncertainty associated with using a signal detection theory model to analyze data from forensic black-box studies.

Forensic science international·2026
Same author

A study of examiner accuracy in cartridge case comparisons. Part 1: Examiner error rates.

Forensic science international·2023
Same author

A study of examiner accuracy in cartridge case comparisons. Part 2: Examiner use of the AFTE range of conclusions.

Forensic science international·2023
Same author

Connecting a disconnected trial network with a new trial: optimizing the estimation of a comparative effect in a network meta-analysis.

BMC medical research methodology·2023
Same author

Commentary on: I. Dror, N Scurich "(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science" Forensic Science International: Synergy 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.08.006.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2021
Same author

Validation of tool mark comparisons obtained using a quantitative, comparative, statistical algorithm.

Journal of forensic sciences·2010
Same journal

GenoEye: A machine learning-based framework for the prediction of intermediate eye color phenotypes.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Sharp force trauma analysis without animal bones: A proposal for sustainable and ethical bone proxies.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Absolute dating of modern paper using <sup>14</sup>C bomb peak data of the paper fibers.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Forensic timeline investigation of Apple Health app on iOS.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Help v. harm: How a "lookup table" for evaluating DNA evidence given activity-level propositions could lead to wrongful convictions.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Development and Evaluation of an Iodoplatinate-Based Strip-Type Kit for On-Site Drug Screening in Beverages".

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

14.0K

An Improved Version of a Tool Mark Comparison Algorithm.

Jeremy R Hadler1, Max D Morris1

  • 1Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50010.

Journal of Forensic Sciences
|September 9, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study improves a tool mark comparison algorithm by replacing random sampling with a deterministic process. This enhances score consistency and error rate control for forensic analysis.

Keywords:
U-statisticcorrelated dataforensic scienceprofilometryscrewdriverstriae

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.0K
Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

488

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

14.0K
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.0K
Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

488

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Pattern Evidence Analysis
  • Biometrics

Background:

  • Statistical algorithms aid tool mark comparison in forensics.
  • Previous methods lacked calibration and relied on randomized tests, leading to inconsistent results.
  • Uncalibrated error rates and score variability hinder reliable tool mark analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an improved, deterministic algorithm for tool mark comparison.
  • To enhance score consistency and provide predictable error rate control.
  • To address the uncalibrated nature and randomization weaknesses of prior methods.

Main Methods:

  • Replaced the random sampling step in the original algorithm with a deterministic process.
  • Developed a new procedure for comparing pairs of tool marks.
  • Applied the improved algorithm to known matching and non-matching tool mark pairs.

Main Results:

  • The improved algorithm eliminates randomized scores, yielding more consistent similarity values.
  • The deterministic process allows for more predictable error rate control.
  • Empirical testing demonstrated the enhanced performance compared to the original algorithm.

Conclusions:

  • The revised algorithm offers a more reliable and consistent approach to tool mark comparison.
  • Deterministic processing improves the predictability of error rates in forensic tool mark analysis.
  • This advancement contributes to more robust pattern evidence examination.