Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combination Treatment with Sclerostin and Dkk1 Antibodies Synergizes with Tibial Loading to Stimulate Bone Formation in Aged Mice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Closing the Gap: Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Regional and Rural North Queensland, Australia.

Annals of vascular surgery·2026
Same author

Comparing BEST-CLI Participants with Patients Treated at a Tertiary Center Serving a Regional-Remote Population.

Annals of vascular surgery·2026
Same author

CRISPR-Based Gene Dependency Screens Reveal Mechanism of BRAF Inhibitor Resistance in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer.

Molecular carcinogenesis·2026
Same author

A Decade of Leadership and Impact: Celebrating 10 Years of the ORS Spine Section.

JOR spine·2026
Same author

Spatial transcriptomics for gene discovery identifies <i>Slc13a5</i> as a modulator of bone mechanoadaptation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Developing a Rat Model for Weight-Bearing Intervention to Investigate Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head
05:55

Author Spotlight: Developing a Rat Model for Weight-Bearing Intervention to Investigate Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

Published on: September 27, 2024

1.0K

Evaluation of loading parameters for murine axial tibial loading: Stimulating cortical bone formation while reducing

David Sun1,2, Michael D Brodt1, Heather M Zannit1,2

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in Saint Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110.

Journal of Orthopaedic Research : Official Publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society
|September 10, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study optimized mechanical loading parameters for bone formation in mice. Reducing daily cycles and study length effectively stimulates periosteal bone growth without compromising results.

Keywords:
bone formationbone mechanobiologyin vivo mechanical loadingmouse modelmouse tibial loading

More Related Videos

A Non-Invasive Method for Generating the Cyclic Loading-Induced Intra-Articular Cartilage Lesion Model of the Rat Knee
05:04

A Non-Invasive Method for Generating the Cyclic Loading-Induced Intra-Articular Cartilage Lesion Model of the Rat Knee

Published on: July 5, 2021

2.6K
Half-segmental Diaphyseal Bone Defect Model in Rats for Evaluating Bone Substitute Performance in Load-bearing Regions
04:37

Half-segmental Diaphyseal Bone Defect Model in Rats for Evaluating Bone Substitute Performance in Load-bearing Regions

Published on: December 30, 2025

108

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Developing a Rat Model for Weight-Bearing Intervention to Investigate Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head
05:55

Author Spotlight: Developing a Rat Model for Weight-Bearing Intervention to Investigate Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

Published on: September 27, 2024

1.0K
A Non-Invasive Method for Generating the Cyclic Loading-Induced Intra-Articular Cartilage Lesion Model of the Rat Knee
05:04

A Non-Invasive Method for Generating the Cyclic Loading-Induced Intra-Articular Cartilage Lesion Model of the Rat Knee

Published on: July 5, 2021

2.6K
Half-segmental Diaphyseal Bone Defect Model in Rats for Evaluating Bone Substitute Performance in Load-bearing Regions
04:37

Half-segmental Diaphyseal Bone Defect Model in Rats for Evaluating Bone Substitute Performance in Load-bearing Regions

Published on: December 30, 2025

108

Area of Science:

  • Bone mechanobiology
  • Skeletal response to mechanical loading
  • Cortical bone adaptation

Background:

  • Classic bone mechanobiology studies highlighted loading parameters' anabolic effects.
  • Previous research often used outdated methods and non-murine models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Re-evaluate loading parameters' impact on cortical bone response.
  • Utilize a contemporary murine axial tibial compression model.
  • Optimize loading protocols for bone formation studies.

Main Methods:

  • Subjected tibias of 5-month-old female C57Bl/6 mice to cyclic mechanical loading (4 Hz).
  • Assessed bone formation using dynamic and static histomorphometry.
  • Varied peak strain magnitude, daily cycle number, loading frequency, and study duration.

Main Results:

  • Peak strain magnitude significantly influenced periosteal bone formation (Ps.MS/BS, Ps.BFR/BS).
  • Reduced daily cycles (60-300) did not diminish bone formation.
  • Decreased loading frequency (3 vs. 5 days/week) significantly reduced periosteal response.
  • Study duration reduction (1 vs. 2 weeks) did not affect outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Optimized protocol: -1,800 μϵ peak strain, 4 Hz, 60 cycles/day, 5 days/week (1 week) stimulates periosteal lamellar bone.
  • Loading duration (daily cycles, study length) can be reduced without losing anabolic effect.
  • Findings provide a basis for more efficient bone mechanobiology research.