Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

10:39
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
1.3K
Policy evaluation and democracy: Do they fit?
1University of Bern, KPM Center for Public Management, Schanzeneckstrasse 1, P.O. Box, CH-3001 Bern, Switzerland.
Evaluation and Program Planning
|September 12, 2017
Summary
Policy evaluation and democracy are compatible. Research shows evaluations enhance democratic processes, increasing deliberative quality in campaigns and informing parliamentarians.
Area of Science:
- Political Science
- Public Policy
Background:
- Examines the relationship between democratic processes and policy evaluation.
- Investigates the utilization of evaluations within democratic systems.
Discussion:
- Argues for a more integrated role of policy evaluation in democracy, extending beyond expert use.
- Highlights the surprising familiarity of parliamentarians with evaluation findings.
- Demonstrates how incorporating evaluations into policy arguments improves the deliberative quality of democratic campaigns.
Key Insights:
- Policy evaluation and democracy are highly compatible.
- Increased use of evaluations strengthens democratic deliberation.
- Parliamentarians are more engaged with policy evaluations than previously assumed.
Outlook:
- Suggests future research on maximizing the synergy between evaluation and democratic practices.
- Encourages broader adoption of evidence-based policy-making in democratic governance.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
345
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
345
Equity Theory
329
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
329
Social Exchange Theory
541
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
541
Social Exchange Theory
40.8K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.8K
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation
209
Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often...
209
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
2.1K
A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:
2.1K
