Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-Term Mechanical Complications After Lumbar Fusion in Patients Receiving Tirzepatide vs Other GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.

Spine·2026
Same author

The History of Neurological Surgery at the University of Illinois Chicago.

World neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Long-Term Risk of Subsequent Cervical Fusion After Endoscopic Versus Open Cervical Decompression.

Global spine journal·2026
Same author

Endoscopic corpus callosotomy for drug-resistant epilepsy due to cerebral folate transporter deficiency: illustrative case.

Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons·2026
Same author

Neuroinflammatory stress preferentially impacts synaptic MAPK signaling and mitochondria in excitatory neurons.

Molecular neurodegeneration advances·2026
Same author

Simultaneous profiling of native-state proteomes and transcriptomes of neural cell types using proximity labeling.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Dissecting first-episode psychosis heterogeneity with clustering analyses: a systematic review.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Irisin and anxiety-like behaviors: Mechanistic integration of peripheral-central crosstalk, neuroinflammation and neural plasticity.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Rhythms of interaction - the timescales of social coordination and why they matter.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Neural Bases of Memory Development: Insights from Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Regional heterogeneity of brain insulin resistance: From molecular pathways to neural circuits.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Automated Gait Analysis to Assess Functional Recovery in Rodents with Peripheral Nerve or Spinal Cord Contusion Injury
06:31

Automated Gait Analysis to Assess Functional Recovery in Rodents with Peripheral Nerve or Spinal Cord Contusion Injury

Published on: October 6, 2020

6.7K

Functional gait analysis in a spinal contusion rat model.

Abhiraj D Bhimani1, Pouyan Kheirkhah2, Gregory D Arnone2

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 912 South Wood Street, MC 799, 4N NPI, Chicago, IL 60612, United States; College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 912 South Wood Street, MC 799, 4N NPI, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.

Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
|September 13, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Choosing the right functional analysis test for spinal cord injury (SCI) rat models is crucial. This study compares five methods, evaluating accuracy, reproducibility, and cost to guide universal adoption for SCI research.

Keywords:
BBB scaleCatWalkFunctional gait analysisLadder testSpinal cord injuryVICON

More Related Videos

3D Kinematic Gait Analysis for Preclinical Studies in Rodents
10:19

3D Kinematic Gait Analysis for Preclinical Studies in Rodents

Published on: August 3, 2019

11.4K
Thoracic Spinal Cord Hemisection Surgery and Open-Field Locomotor Assessment in the Rat
06:44

Thoracic Spinal Cord Hemisection Surgery and Open-Field Locomotor Assessment in the Rat

Published on: June 26, 2019

10.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Automated Gait Analysis to Assess Functional Recovery in Rodents with Peripheral Nerve or Spinal Cord Contusion Injury
06:31

Automated Gait Analysis to Assess Functional Recovery in Rodents with Peripheral Nerve or Spinal Cord Contusion Injury

Published on: October 6, 2020

6.7K
3D Kinematic Gait Analysis for Preclinical Studies in Rodents
10:19

3D Kinematic Gait Analysis for Preclinical Studies in Rodents

Published on: August 3, 2019

11.4K
Thoracic Spinal Cord Hemisection Surgery and Open-Field Locomotor Assessment in the Rat
06:44

Thoracic Spinal Cord Hemisection Surgery and Open-Field Locomotor Assessment in the Rat

Published on: June 26, 2019

10.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Animal Models
  • Rehabilitation Science

Background:

  • Evaluating functional recovery in spinal cord injury (SCI) rat models is vital for developing new treatments.
  • A wide array of functional analysis methods exist, each with unique advantages and limitations.
  • Selecting the optimal method for specific research needs can be challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the strengths and weaknesses of five common functional analysis tests used in SCI rat models.
  • To identify a test that is accurate, reproducible, and cost-effective for universal adoption in SCI research.
  • To compare simple methods (BBB, Ladder, Rotating Rod) against complex, computerized methods (CatWalk, Kinect, VICON).

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of five functional analysis tests: Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) test, Ladder walking test, CatWalk test, Rotating Rod test, Microsoft Kinect system, and VICON.
  • Evaluation criteria included sensitivity, data quality, statistical analysis capabilities, and potential for human error.
  • Analysis focused on contrasting the pros and cons of basic versus advanced, automated testing systems.

Main Results:

  • The study systematically compares the performance metrics of simple and complex functional assessment tools for SCI rat models.
  • Key differences in sensitivity, data output, statistical robustness, and operator-dependent error rates were identified across methods.
  • Findings highlight trade-offs between ease of use, cost, and the depth of quantitative data provided by each test.

Conclusions:

  • No single functional analysis test is universally superior; the choice depends on specific research objectives and resource availability.
  • Understanding the comparative strengths and weaknesses of each method is essential for informed selection in SCI research.
  • This analysis provides a framework for researchers to choose the most appropriate and efficient functional assessment tool for their SCI rat models.