Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments
Published on: March 28, 2018
Kinetic and kinematic patterns during high intensity clean movement: searching for optimal load
Achraf Ammar1,2, Bryan L Riemann3, Liwa Masmoudi1
1a Research Unit: Education, Motricity, Sport and Health, UR15JS01, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax , Sfax University , Sfax , Tunisia.
For elite weightlifters, training the clean movement at 90% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) optimizes explosive power and force production. This load enhances power output and maintains technical efficiency, crucial for maximizing performance in the clean.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Biomechanics
- Strength and Conditioning
Background:
- Optimizing training loads is critical for enhancing athletic performance in weightlifting.
- Understanding the relationship between external load and biomechanical outcomes is essential for developing effective training programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of varying training loads on kinematic and kinetic variables during the clean movement in elite weightlifters.
- To identify an optimal training load that maximizes power production and technical efficiency for the clean exercise.
Main Methods:
- Nine elite weightlifters performed the clean exercise at 85%, 90%, 95%, and 100% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM) in a randomized order.
- Kinematic data (displacement, velocity, acceleration) and kinetic data (force, power, rate of force development) were collected using a 3D motion capture system and force platform.
- Statistical analysis was performed to assess differences across the tested loads.
Main Results:
- Significant load effects were observed for most kinematic and kinetic parameters (p < 0.01).
- Peak power and peak bar velocity were highest at 85% and 90% 1RM (p < 0.001).
- Greater average power, work, and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) were observed at 90%, 95%, and 100% 1RM compared to 85% 1RM (p < 0.05).
- Peak vGRF and peak rate of force development (RFD) were not significantly affected by load (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
- A training load of 90% 1RM appears most advantageous for elite weightlifters aiming to enhance explosive force and power output during the clean.
- This load facilitates maximal power production while preserving technical execution, suggesting its utility for targeted training.
More Related Videos
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
07:30Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
Published on: May 1, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Impact Loading
In cases of elastic deformation,...
Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions
Isotonic contractions
Isotonic contractions occur when a muscle changes length while...
Kinetic Energy
Kinetic Energy - II
Kinetic Energy - I
Kinetic Friction