Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Platelet reactivity-adjusted antiplatelet therapy in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention: a
Zhenhua Xing1, Liang Tang1, Zhaowei Zhu1
1a Department of Cardiovascular Medicine , The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha , Hunan , China.
Insights
Tailoring antiplatelet therapy based on platelet function monitoring did not reduce adverse events or bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This approach failed to improve outcomes compared to conventional antiplatelet treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- High on-treatment platelet reactivity is a known risk factor for adverse events post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- The effectiveness of tailoring antiplatelet therapy based on platelet function monitoring remains controversial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of platelet reactivity-adjusted antiplatelet therapy versus conventional therapy in patients undergoing PCI.
- To assess the impact on mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and bleeding.
Main Methods:
- A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases for relevant randomized trials.
- Inclusion of six studies with 6347 patients comparing tailored vs. conventional antiplatelet therapy.
- Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were derived using fixed-effect models for primary and safety end points.
Main Results:
- Tailoring antiplatelet therapy did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.63-1.24).
- No significant reduction was observed in MACE (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92-1.14), myocardial infarction (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.95-1.21), or major bleeding events (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.53-1.17).
- Specific outcomes like cardiovascular death, stent thrombosis, and stroke/TIA also showed no significant benefit with tailored therapy.
Conclusions:
- Platelet reactivity testing-guided antiplatelet therapy failed to demonstrate superiority over conventional treatment in reducing mortality, MACE, or bleeding in PCI patients.
- Current evidence does not support routine tailoring of antiplatelet therapy based on platelet function monitoring in this population.
Abstract:
Numerous number of evidences show that high on-treatment platelet reactivity is a well-known risk factor for adverse events in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Controversial situations still exist regarding the effectiveness of tailoring antiplatelet therapy according to platelet function monitoring. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for randomized trials comparing platelet reactivity-adjusted antiplatelet therapy with conventional antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing PCI. The primary end point was all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including cardiovascular (CV) death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), revascularization, and stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The safety end point was defined as major bleeding events. We derived pooled risk ratios (RRs) with fixed-effect models. Six studies enrolling 6347 patients were included. Compared with conventional treatment, tailoring antiplatelet failed to reduce all-cause mortality (RR: 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-1.24, P = 0.48), MACE (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92-1.14, P = 0.69), MI (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.95-1.21, P = 0.24), CV death (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.40-1.19, P = 0.09), ST (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.50-1.38, P = 0.23), stroke or TIA (RR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.55-2.12, P = 0.83), revascularization (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.69-1.33, P = 0.79), and major bleeding events (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.53-1.17, P = 0.24). Compared with traditional antiplatelet treatment, tailoring antiplatelet therapy according to platelet reactivity testing failed to reduce all-cause mortality, MACE, and major bleeding events in patients undergoing PCI.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...
Angina IV: Management

