Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026
Murine Model of Leukemia Relapse to Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Published on: October 17, 2025
Prognostic Model to Predict Post-Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
Fong Chun Chan1, Anja Mottok1, Alina S Gerrie1
1Fong Chun Chan, Anja Mottok, Alina S. Gerrie, Maryse Power, Kerry J. Savage, Sohrab P. Shah, Joseph M. Connors, Randy D. Gascoyne, David W. Scott, and Christian Steidl, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Fong Chun Chan, Anja Mottok, Sohrab P. Shah, and Christian Steidl, University of British Columbia, Canada; Marcel Nijland, Arjan Diepstra, and Anke van den Berg, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; and Peter Kamper, Francesco d'Amore, Alexander Lindholm d'Amore, and Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract:
Purpose Our aim was to capture the biology of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) at the time of relapse and discover novel and robust biomarkers that predict outcomes after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). Materials and Methods We performed digital gene expression profiling on a cohort of 245 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 174 patients with cHL, including 71 with biopsies taken at both primary diagnosis and relapse, to investigate temporal gene expression differences and associations with post-ASCT outcomes. Relapse biopsies from a training cohort of 65 patients were used to build a gene expression-based prognostic model of post-ASCT outcomes (RHL30), and two independent cohorts were used for validation. Results Gene expression profiling revealed that 24% of patients exhibited poorly correlated expression patterns between their biopsies taken at initial diagnosis and relapse, indicating biologic divergence. Comparative analysis of the prognostic power of gene expression measurements in primary versus relapse specimens demonstrated that the biology captured at the time of relapse contained superior properties for post-ASCT outcome prediction. We developed RHL30, using relapse specimens, which identified a subset of high-risk patients with inferior post-ASCT outcomes in two independent external validation cohorts. The prognostic power of RHL30 was independent of reported clinical prognostic markers (both at initial diagnosis and at relapse) and microenvironmental components as assessed by immunohistochemistry. Conclusion We have developed and validated a novel clinically applicable prognostic assay that at the time of first relapse identifies patients with unfavorable post-ASCT outcomes. Moving forward, it will be critical to evaluate the clinical use of RHL30 in the context of positron emission tomography-guided response assessment and the evolving cHL treatment landscape.
