Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

07:34
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
Published on: August 22, 2018
8.6K
Egg shape mimicry in parasitic cuckoos.
M R G Attard1,2, I Medina3, N E Langmore3
1Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
|September 13, 2017
Summary
Parasitic cuckoos evolve egg mimicry to avoid host rejection. This study reveals Australian cuckoos mimic both egg size and shape, especially in open nests, suggesting coordinated evolution of mimicry traits.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Ornithology
- Behavioral Ecology
Background:
- Brood parasitism by cuckoos involves laying eggs in host nests.
- Cuckoo egg mimicry of host eggs (color, pattern, size) evolves to evade rejection.
- Egg shape mimicry in cuckoos remains largely unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate egg shape and size mimicry in Australian cuckoo species.
- To determine if cuckoo egg morphology (shape, size) matches host eggs.
- To assess the influence of nest type (open vs. closed) on mimicry levels.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of egg morphometrics (shape, size) between cuckoo species and their hosts.
- Focus on three Australian cuckoos: fan-tailed, brush, and pallid cuckoos.
- Statistical evaluation of mimicry evidence and correlation with host nest architecture.
Main Results:
- Confirmed egg size mimicry in Australian cuckoo-host systems.
- Provided the first evidence of egg shape mimicry in pallid and brush cuckoos.
- Found higher cuckoo-host egg similarity in open nests compared to closed nests.
Conclusions:
- Egg shape mimicry is a documented phenomenon in cuckoo-host systems.
- Mimicry in egg size, shape, and color likely evolves in concert.
- Nest type influences the intensity of selection pressure for cuckoo egg mimicry.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
21.8K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
21.8K
Mate Choice
11.9K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
11.9K
Frequency-dependent Selection
24.3K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.3K
Limits to Natural Selection
35.4K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
35.4K
Nonconscious Mimicry
5.1K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
5.1K
Symbiosis
37.7K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
37.7K

