Comparative analysis of initial vocalizations of preterm and full-term infants with and without risk for development

Isabela de Moraes Fattore1, Rejane Maiara Uhde1, Luciéle Dias Oliveira1

  • 1Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM - Santa Maria (RS), Brasil.

Codas
|September 14, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Infant vocalizations, particularly those using motherese, correlated with developmental risks. Early risk indicators were more sensitive in Phase 1, while language tests proved more effective in Phase 2 for assessing infant development.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Infant Communication Studies
  • Pediatric Health Research

Background:

  • Vocalization is a key developmental milestone in infants, reflecting cognitive and social-emotional growth.
  • Understanding vocalization patterns in preterm and full-term infants can identify early developmental trajectories.
  • Risk factors can influence infant development, necessitating sensitive assessment tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare vocalization development in preterm versus full-term infants.
  • To examine infants with and without developmental risks.
  • To explore associations between sociodemographic, obstetric, and psychosocial factors and infant vocalization.

Main Methods:

  • Longitudinal study of 30 infants (preterm and full-term) across two phases (4-5 months and 6-7 months).
  • Utilized Child Development Risk Indicators (IRDl) and Denver II Test for developmental assessment.
  • Collected sociodemographic, obstetric, and psychosocial data via interviews and mother-infant dyad filming analyzed with ELAN software.

Main Results:

  • Increased infant and maternal "motherese" vocalizations in Phase 2 correlated with more Child Development Risk Indicators (IRDls).
  • A significant rise in non-"motherese" vocalizations was noted in Phase 2.
  • Sociodemographic factors, gestational age, birth weight, and maternal education did not directly impact infant vocalization levels.

Conclusions:

  • Infant vocalizations in Phase 1 were sensitive to developmental risks and IRDls.
  • The Denver II language test demonstrated greater effectiveness in Phase 2 for developmental assessment.
  • No significant influence of sociodemographic variables on infant vocalization was observed during the study periods.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos