Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Validity of self-reported anthropometry in adult Mexican women
Eduardo Ortiz-Panozo1, Elsa Yunes-Díaz1, Martin Lajous1,2
1Center for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health. Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Objective::
To compare direct and self-reported anthropometry in Mexican women.
Materials And Methods::
Women aged 30-72 years, participating in the Mexican Teachers' Cohort, completed a questionnaire with their anthropometric data in 2006-2008. After eleven months (median time), technicians performed anthropometry in 3756 participants. We calculated correlations and multivariable-adjusted mean differences between direct and self-reported anthropometric measures.
Results::
Correlations between direct and self-reported anthropometric measures ranged from 0.78 (waist circumference) to 0.93 (weight). On average, women over-reported their height by 2.2 cm and underreported their weight, body mass index (BMI) and waist and hip circumferences by 1.3 kg, 1.3 kg/m2, 1.8 cm and 1.9 cm, respectively. Errors in self-reported anthropometry increased with rising measured BMI and were also independently associated with age, education and socioeconomic status.
Conclusion::
Self-reported anthropometry is sufficiently valid for epidemiological purposes in adult Mexican women. Errors in self-reported anthropometry might result in underestimation of the prevalence of overweight and obesity.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation

