Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.9K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

17.1K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
17.1K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.4K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.4K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.4K
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

1.3K
Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
1.3K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

500
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
500

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Silicosis in the Artificial Stone Countertop Industry: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2026
Same author

Evaluation of tools to assess decision-making capacity in minor adolescents in clinical settings: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.

BMC medical ethics·2026
Same author

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) in society. Healthcare providers and researchers' views on the public health and socio-cultural implications of PRS in healthcare contexts.

Journal of community genetics·2026
Same author

Polygenic risk scores in health care contexts: Expanding roles, redrawing boundaries?

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same author

Occupational and environmental exposures contribute to lung function heterogeneity in sarcoidosis.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2026
Same author

Contrasting sources of dietary intake of cobalt and lead in the mining region of Katanga, DR Congo: a duplicate meal study.

Environmental research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

Differing Perceptions Concerning Research Integrity Between Universities and Industry: A Qualitative Study.

Simon Godecharle1, Benoit Nemery2, Kris Dierickx3

  • 1Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Box 7001, 3000, Louvain, Belgium. simon.godecharle@emmaus.be.

Science and Engineering Ethics
|September 16, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Biomedical industry and university researchers show different views on research integrity and misconduct. These discrepancies in perspectives may hinder vital research collaborations between sectors.

Keywords:
IndustryResearch integrityResearch misconductUniversity

More Related Videos

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.9K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.9K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Science
  • Research Ethics
  • Industry-Academia Collaboration

Background:

  • Empirical studies on research integrity and misconduct have largely excluded biomedical industry professionals.
  • Understanding industry perspectives is crucial given increasing academic-industry collaborations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare the perspectives of research managers and biomedical researchers in industry versus universities on research integrity and misconduct.
  • To identify potential discrepancies that could impact collaborative research efforts.

Main Methods:

  • A qualitative study employing 22 semi-structured interviews.
  • Participants included research managers and biomedical researchers from both industry and university settings.

Main Results:

  • Significant discrepancies were observed between industry and university groups regarding research integrity and misconduct.
  • Varying definitions of research misconduct and diverse management strategies were reported, indicating heterogeneous judgment of similar actions.
  • Individual-level differences in perspectives were noted based on sector (industry vs. university).

Conclusions:

  • Managing research integrity is challenging due to diverse perspectives on key elements.
  • Discrepancies in standards and definitions between industry and universities can undermine collaborations.
  • Ineffective management policies risk being misaligned with the views of biomedical researchers and managers.