Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

13:44
Haptic/Graphic Rehabilitation: Integrating a Robot into a Virtual Environment Library and Applying it to Stroke Therapy
Published on: August 8, 2011
14.7K
Evaluation of contactless human-machine interface for robotic surgical training
Fabien Despinoy1,2, Nabil Zemiti3, Germain Forestier4
1LTSI-INSERM, Université de Rennes 1, UMR 1099, 35000, Rennes, France. fabien.despinoy@univ-rennes1.fr.
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
|September 16, 2017
Summary
A low-cost Leap Motion sensor offers feasible control for robotic surgery training, though it doesn't match traditional interfaces. This contactless method enables precise tracking for dexterous laparoscopic gestures, promising future human-machine interfaces.
Area of Science:
- Robotics
- Surgical Simulation
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Teleoperated robotic systems are vital in surgery, necessitating specialized training.
- Current robotic surgical simulators are costly and require dedicated interfaces.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a low-cost, contactless optical sensor (Leap Motion) for controlling the RAVEN-II robot.
- To compare its performance against a traditional contact-based device (Sigma.7) in a peg manipulation task.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Leap Motion sensor for robotic control in a surgical training task.
- Employed metric-based analysis and unsupervised spatiotemporal trajectory clustering for performance assessment.
- Compared contactless (Leap Motion) versus contact-based (Sigma.7) manipulation.
Main Results:
- Contactless control showed limitations in manipulability compared to the contact-based device.
- Metric-based evaluation favored the mechanical control.
- Trajectory clustering revealed distinct signatures related to each human-machine interface.
Conclusions:
- Contactless optical sensing is feasible for controlling surgical instruments, enabling dexterous laparoscopic training.
- While not surpassing high-standard mechanical interfaces, this approach shows potential for developing future robotic surgical training systems.
Keywords:
Contactless teleoperationHand trackingHuman–machine interfaceRobotic surgical trainingUnsupervised trajectory analysis
