Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A comparison of the Quick Dementia Rating System and Montreal Cognitive Assessment for detecting mild cognitive impairment and dementia assessed by the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026
Same author

Beyond traditional assessments of cognitive status: Exploring the potential of spatial navigation tasks.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Kupffer cell plasticity regulates hepatic immunity in mycobacterial infection.

Journal of hepatology·2026
Same author

Spatial navigation as a digital marker for clinically differentiating cognitive impairment severity.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

SPACE: A novel digital tool for assessing hippocampal structural integrity in older adults.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

C1q and mannose-binding lectin binding and complement activation across genetically diverse Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.3K

Evaluation of a conceptual framework for predicting navigation performance in virtual reality.

Jascha Grübel1, Tyler Thrash1, Christoph Hölscher1

  • 1Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.

Plos One
|September 16, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Dynamic tasks, like intercepting moving objects, better predict virtual reality (VR) navigation performance than static spatial tasks. This finding suggests focusing on dynamic assessments for improved VR navigation research.

More Related Videos

Virtual Reality Experiments with Physiological Measures
07:09

Virtual Reality Experiments with Physiological Measures

Published on: August 29, 2018

13.3K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.3K
Virtual Reality Experiments with Physiological Measures
07:09

Virtual Reality Experiments with Physiological Measures

Published on: August 29, 2018

13.3K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Virtual Reality

Background:

  • Traditional spatial cognition research uses static tasks, often categorized as egocentric or allocentric, to understand navigation.
  • The two-systems approach based on these static tasks has proven insufficient for predicting navigation performance in virtual reality (VR).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the predictive power of various simple spatial tasks on navigation performance in a virtual environment.
  • To determine if dynamic tasks offer better predictions of navigation performance in VR compared to static tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Participants learned and navigated a virtual city, then completed eight simple spatial tasks across static/dynamic, perceived/remembered, egocentric/allocentric, and distance/direction dimensions.
  • Confirmatory and exploratory analyses were used to correlate simple task performance with virtual navigation success.

Main Results:

  • A dynamic task, specifically intercepting a moving object, significantly predicted navigation performance in a familiar virtual environment.
  • Dynamic tasks, requiring interaction with a human interface device (HID), aligned more closely with perceptuomotor processes of locomotion than static tasks.

Conclusions:

  • Dynamic spatial tasks are more effective predictors of virtual reality navigation performance than traditional static tasks.
  • Future VR navigation research should incorporate dynamic tasks and assess their impact to differentiate between HID proficiency and spatial knowledge acquisition.