Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Schemas01:42

Schemas

12.4K
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
12.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The mind's average: Unseen, internally generated ensemble representations can guide visual attention.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

'Not so intuitive' physics: Orientation supersedes stability in prioritizing attention.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

Rapid development of inhibitory effects in response to novel features: It's mostly target-feature enhancement.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

Examining visual prior entry of semantic affective valences: positive is biased over negative.

Cognition & emotion·2025
Same author

Selectively attended information is obligatorily encoded into visual working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

The fate of visual working memory items after their job is done.

Journal of vision·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.4K

Ironic capture: top-down expectations exacerbate distraction in visual search.

Greg Huffman1, Jason Rajsic2, Jay Pratt2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. greg.huffman@mail.utoronto.ca.

Psychological Research
|September 17, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Attempting to ignore a predictable visual distractor paradoxically slows down search performance. This ironic processing effect highlights how foreknowledge of salient distractors can hinder visual search efficiency.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.6K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

988

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.4K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.6K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

988

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • Ironic processing, or the 'white bear' effect, occurs when trying to suppress a thought increases its recurrence.
  • Visual search involves locating a target among distractors, a process susceptible to interference.
  • Salient distractors, like color singletons, can capture attention and impede search.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of ironic processing in visual search tasks.
  • To determine if attempting to ignore a predictable salient distractor impairs search performance.
  • To differentiate ironic processing effects from other potential confounds in visual search.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using a visual search task with a salient color singleton.
  • Participants' response times were measured under conditions of predictable versus random singleton locations.
  • Control conditions were implemented to rule out dual-task costs and block order effects.

Main Results:

  • Informed participants attempting to predict the singleton's location showed slower response times compared to random conditions.
  • The detrimental effect was more pronounced in participants actively trying to use the predictive strategy.
  • When participants abandoned the strategy, performance in predictable conditions matched random conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Foreknowledge of a salient distractor's location can ironically increase its interference in visual search.
  • This suggests that conscious attempts to control attention can be counterproductive when dealing with predictable distractors.
  • Ironic processing plays a significant role in modulating attentional control during visual search.