Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 17, 2011
Lidocaine Gel for Urethral Catheterization in Children: A Meta-Analysis
Michael E Chua1, Paul Nimrod B Firaza2, Jessica M Ming3
1The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Insights
Lidocaine gel offers no significant pain reduction for pediatric transurethral bladder catheterization compared to nonanesthetic gel. This finding is particularly true for children under four years old.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Anesthesiology
- Urology
- Pain Management
Background:
- Transurethral bladder catheterization (TUBC) is a common procedure in pediatric care.
- Procedural pain during TUBC can cause distress and anxiety in children.
- Effective pain management strategies are crucial for improving patient experience.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of lidocaine gel versus nonanesthetic gel (NAG) for pain reduction during pediatric TUBC.
- To determine if lidocaine gel provides a significant benefit over NAG in alleviating procedural pain.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across electronic databases and trial registries up to September 2016.
- Included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing lidocaine gel and NAG for TUBC pain in children.
- Data were pooled using a random-effects model, with subgroup analysis for age groups.
Main Results:
- Five RCTs involving 369 children were analyzed.
- Lidocaine gel showed no statistically significant benefit in reducing TUBC pain compared to NAG (SMD, -0.22; 95% CI, -0.65 to 0.21).
- No difference in pain reduction was observed in children younger than 4 years (SMD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.22 to 0.24), and no serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions:
- Lidocaine gel does not appear to be more effective than NAG in reducing pain associated with pediatric TUBC.
- The findings suggest that lidocaine gel may not offer a significant advantage for pain management in this procedure, especially in younger children.
Objective:
To compare the efficacy and safety of lidocaine gel vs nonanesthetic gel (NAG) in reducing transurethral bladder catheterization (TUBC) procedural pain in children.
Study Design:
A systematic literature search was done using electronic medical databases and trial registries up to September 2016 with no language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy and safety of lidocaine gel vs NAG in reducing TUBC-associated pain in children were screened, identified, and appraised. Risks of bias and study quality of the eligible trials were assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration recommendations. Various pain assessment scales from the included studies were extracted as mean differences and standard deviations for each treatment group. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were generated with 95% CIs for between-group difference estimation. Effect estimates were pooled using the inverse variance method with a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed for different age groups.
Results:
Five RCTs (with a total of 369 children) were included. Overall pooled effect estimates showed that compared with NAG, lidocaine gel has no significant benefit in decreasing TUBC-associated pain in children (SMD, -0.22; 95% CI, -0.65 to 0.21). Effect estimates from 4 studies revealed no difference in pain reduction between the lidocaine gel and NAG in children aged <4 years (SMD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.22 to 0.24). No serious adverse events from the lidocaine gel use were reported in any of the studies.
Conclusions:
Lidocaine gel does not appear to reduce TUBC pain compared with NAG, specifically in children aged <4 years.
Prospero Registration Number:
CRD42016050018.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Common Agents and Their Applications
Cocaine is an ester of benzoic acid and methylecgogine. It is used to anesthetize and vasoconstrict locally. Currently, it is used primarily for topical applications. It is beneficial for surgeries on the upper respiratory tract, providing anesthesia and shrinking the mucosa. Cocaine in the form of cocaine hydrochloride is...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Pharmacokinetics

